How High Will a Lighter-Than-Water Ball Shoot Above the Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thrill211
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
A small ball released from a depth of 0.600 m in water, with a density of 0.300 that of water, will rise due to buoyancy. The discussion emphasizes using energy principles to equate the work done to submerge the ball with the gravitational potential energy gained upon release. The negligible drag force simplifies the analysis, allowing a focus on buoyant forces. The concept of buoyancy is further illustrated by comparing human density variations based on body composition. Understanding these principles is crucial for determining how high the ball will shoot above the water's surface.
thrill211
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that you release a small ball from rest at a depth of 0.600 m below the surface in a pool of water. If the density of the ball is 0.300 that of water and if the drag force on the ball from the water is negligible, how high above the water surface will the ball shoot as it emerges from the water? (Neglect any transfer of energy to the splashing and waves produced by the emerging ball.)

Homework Equations


F(b) = m(f)g (f is for fluid) - in this case water


The Attempt at a Solution


No idea how to set it up!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would probably be helpful to think in terms of energy when doing this problem: The work required to push the ball to a depth of 0.6m should equal the gravitational potential energy that it acquires when you release it.
 
Humans are made mostly of http://www.ionizerscompared.com" and are thus very close to being neutrally buoyant. However, if you take a large breath and hold it you can become positively buoyant since your overall volume increases thus lowering you overall density. Fat cells are less dense than water so people who carry a lot of extra fat can float more easily.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top