Schools How important are different schools for undergrad and graduate degree?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the importance of attending different universities for undergraduate and graduate degrees. The original poster, a community college student in Illinois, is contemplating transferring to either UC Berkeley or the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) for their undergraduate studies, with a long-term goal of pursuing a PhD at Berkeley. They express concerns about whether attending the same institution for both degrees could hinder their academic or professional opportunities. Contributors clarify that while gaining diverse experiences from different schools can be beneficial for networking and perspectives, it is not a strict requirement. Staying at the same university can also have advantages, such as strong faculty connections, cost considerations, and personal circumstances. The poster feels reassured by this perspective and is leaning towards UIUC due to its significantly lower costs, while still considering Berkeley for its appeal.
QuantumCurt
Education Advisor
Messages
726
Reaction score
166
Hey everyone, I'm currently attending a community college, and heading into my last year here. I'm starting to fill out my transfer applications, and I was wondering how important it really is to attend different universities for your undergraduate and graduate degrees.

I've always heard that one should do their degrees at different schools to gain wider exposure to different departments and different perspectives. I'm in a community college in Illinois. My two main target transfer schools are UC Berkeley, and U of I Urbana-Champaign. My ultimate goal is to go to Berkeley for my PhD, and I'm wondering if I should cross Berkeley off of my list for the remainder of my undergrad.

As far as the quality of the school goes, there really isn't a whole lot of difference between UIUC and Berkeley, at least as far as I can tell. They're at least comparable in most respects. So I don't feel that I'd really be missing out on much either way. Berkeley has a larger draw in some respects because I've always intended to move to the west coast. UIUC has the draw of saving me around $20,000 in student loans.

I'm hoping I can get some input on this. It would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not that important.

I think what's often said is something along the lines of: "It's a good idea to apply to different schools for your graduate studies because it allows you to expand your horizons, learn from different perspectives, and increase your networking base."

This is different from: "Do not stay in the same place for your graduate studies as your were in for your undergraduate studies as it will somehow present you with academic or professional obstacles."

Unfortunately the advice is often interpreted as the latter.

There can be many good reasons for staying at the same school. You may find a professor or a group that you really like working with. Cost of living might be an issue. Social factors could even play a role in your decision.
Ultimately you should make the decision based on where you think you will learn and perform the best.
 
Thanks for the the input. My interpretation of it has indeed always been the latter.

That puts me a bit more at ease about the situation. I'll most likely end up going to UIUC because of the drastically lower tuition and lower cost of living, but it's still up in the air. Berkeley still has a lot of draw, perhaps more so if it really isn't that crucial to attend separate universities for undergraduate and graduate degrees.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top