Courses How important are first and second year undergrad physics and math courses?

AI Thread Summary
A physics major nearing the end of their second year expresses concern about potentially being behind peers who studied at universities using more rigorous textbooks. They ranked highly in their community college physics and math courses but feel uncertain due to differences in the textbooks used, such as Larson for Calculus and Halliday for Physics, compared to Apostol, Spivak, Kleppner, and Purcell at other institutions. Responses emphasize that the quality of learning is not solely determined by the textbook used and that many students may not necessarily learn more from "better" books. It is suggested to review materials from more advanced texts and to focus on confidence in one's own understanding, as many reputable programs use standard textbooks similar to those the student has already studied. Overall, the discussion reassures that a solid grasp of the material is what truly matters, regardless of textbook choice.
JJHK
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
hello all, I'm a physics major who's finishing up my second year as a physics major. I'm finishing up the 3 introductory physics course sequence and also the 4-semesters of calculus courses.

In my community college, I was able to rank 1st on my physics courses and in the top 5 of my math courses. I'm aiming to transfer to a good university for this upcoming fall.

Now, since I studied in a community college, I feel that I might be behind the other students who studied in a university the first two years. For example, many of the universities that I applied to used Apostol or Spivak's Calculus textbooks, Kleppner's Mechanics, and Purcell's EM, while I studied Calculus through Larson's text and Physics through Halliday's text.

And even as I look back on the previous materials that I've studied, I'm a bit hazy, especially in the areas of EM.

Do you think I should be worried for being a bit fuzzy in the past materials, and do you think I will actually be a lot behind the other students who studied the introductory courses through a more rigorous textbook?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no question but that these are all important courses. The fact that some one else studied with a better book than you did does not a priori mean that he learned any more. In many cases, he learned less, because the "better book" is often more difficult to understand.

In any case, you cannot do anything about the situation. Hang in there, be as sure of what you know as you possibly can, perhaps get a copy of the "better book" to review, and you may be surprised in the end.
 
Using texts such as Spivak or Apostol for Calculus and Purcell for introductory E&M is not very common (I would imagine only the very best of schools use them or perhaps they're used in the "honors" version of certain classes). Most schools use the standard books such as Stewart for Calculus and Halliday or Giancoli or Tipler for introductory physics. In fact if you look at MIT's 8.02 (E&M), they used Giancoli which is a fairly standard intro physics textbook. So I would say if you learned the material well from those books you should be fine.
 
thank u guys for your responses :)
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top