How Is Angular Momentum Calculated for a Gear Mechanism with a Spinning Motor?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum for a gear mechanism with a spinning motor can be calculated using the equation M = w x I, where M is the angular momentum, w is the angular velocity, and I is the moment of inertia. The moment of inertia for the motor is simplified to I = m/2 * (r1^2 + (2*r1 + 2*r2)^2), leading to a calculated torque of 0.0635387 Nm. However, this value differs significantly from the torque calculated using the force and radius of the small gear, which yields 0.24525 Nm. The discussion highlights the necessity of accounting for friction and the continuous power supply required to maintain motor operation, emphasizing the relationship between torque, power, and angular acceleration. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately modeling the gear mechanism's performance.
risecolt
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
In the image showed in the link below I've illustrated a mechanism in which a small gear rotates about a large gear when the motor is spinning. The large gear is rigid and both of the gears are masless, except for the motor. The small gear has a radius of 25mm and the large gear has a radius of 45mm. I need to calculate what angular momentum (torque) is required when the mass of the motor and the angular velocity is known. I have eliminated one degree of freedom, the gears are held in place from getting off.
I'm using the following equation:

M = w x I (angular velocity x moment of inertia).
By simplifying the shape of the motor into a cylinder:
I = m/2 * (r1^2 + (2*r1 + 2*r2)^2
The motor weighs 1 kg and the angular speed is 60 RPM (2pi rad/second).
M = (2pi) * 1/2 * (0.025^2 + (2*0.025 + 2*0.045)^2)) = 0.0635387 Nm

But when I try to compare this with a more classic example:
M = F x r = 1kg*9.81m/s^2 * 0.025 m (radius of the small gear) = 0.24525.
These two values are significantly different.

Which one of these calculations are correct?

http://cognitivenetwork.yolasite.com/resources/Gear.png

Diagram for moment of inertia:
http://www.caddisegni.com/upload/calcoli/1-2.jpg

I realize I've made a small mistake.
So if I once have calculated desired angular momentum, I define torque as the rate of change of angular momentum.
So if I want the angular momentum to occur within 1 second, I can set up the equation:
torque / second = angular momentum. And once the speed has been achieved, there is no more torque.

So my next problem should be: What should the rate of change of angular momentum be, in order to overcome the friction preventing the motor from spinning? In other words, if the angular velocity is too low, the motor will stop. How do I go about to do this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
risecolt said:
And once the speed has been achieved, there is no more torque.

Sorry, but that's not true.. You always have to supply power (and hence torque) to overcome the friction.
 
Hi risecolt,

I don't think you need to go too deep into the physics of it. The power rating of the motor is enough. If the motor has rating P and the small gear is spinning with an angular velocity ω_{1}, the torque on the small gear is τ_{1} = P / ω_{1} . So, considering the gear ratio, the angular velocity of larger gear is ω_{2} = ω_{1} * d_{1} / d_{2}. So the torque on this gear will be τ_{2} = P / ω_{2}

Hope it helps :smile:
 
sci-phy said:
Sorry, but that's not true.. You always have to supply power (and hence torque) to overcome the friction.

I agree. But I am thinking within a certain timeframe, and ideal system.
But we both know what we mean.
 
sci-phy said:
Hi risecolt,

I don't think you need to go too deep into the physics of it. The power rating of the motor is enough. If the motor has rating P and the small gear is spinning with an angular velocity ω_{1}, the torque on the small gear is τ_{1} = P / ω_{1} . So, considering the gear ratio, the angular velocity of larger gear is ω_{2} = ω_{1} * d_{1} / d_{2}. So the torque on this gear will be τ_{2} = P / ω_{2}

Hope it helps :smile:

That's a bit of a problem. Because the large gear doesn't spin. It is rigid.
Only the small gear rotate. So the small gear has to do all the work. Rotate itself, and translate itself about the axis of the large gear. As a bachelor degree student I must include as much physics as possible. But perhaps you can tell me the relationship between this equation and the previous? How about:

Torque = power / angular velocity = moment of inertia * angular acceleration?
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly

Similar threads

Back
Top