How Is Binding Energy Calculated in Nuclear Reactions?

mugen715
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is the question:

2H1 + 3H1 ==> 4He2 + 1n0 +Q

Where Q = 17.7 MeV

The binding energy per nucleon are given below:

2H1 = 1.12 MeV
1n0 = Null
4He2 = 7.07 MeV

" Determine the binding energy per nucleon, in MeV, of tritium (3H1)"


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is how i do it,

The B.E for:

2H1 = 2 x 1.12 = 2.24 MeV
4He2 = 7.07 x 4 = 28.28 MeV

From chemical equation shown above, The energy before reaction is equal to energy after reaction. The energy is conversed before and after reaction:

2.24 + 3(X) = 28.28 MeV + 17.7 MeV

X = 14.58 MeV which is the B.E per nucleon for 3H1

But when i check up the answer, it turns out to be 2.78 MeV. What wrong with my method of solving the questions? can anyone explain what my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are very close.

The problem is that on the right side of the equation, binding energy and energy released cannot be added. Energy released is energy that is actually "there", where as binding energy represents mass or energy that's missing. So when you're combining binding energy and energy released in your very last calculation, they need different signs. Turn that + into a - and you should be home free!
 
gomboc said:
You are very close.

The problem is that on the right side of the equation, binding energy and energy released cannot be added. Energy released is energy that is actually "there", where as binding energy represents mass or energy that's missing. So when you're combining binding energy and energy released in your very last calculation, they need different signs. Turn that + into a - and you should be home free!

Thank for your reply. Is it true to explain this way, the total energy required to form helium is 28.28MeV meanwhile 17.7mev will be release from the 28.28mev..is this correct?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top