How Is Kinetic Energy Calculated After an Electron Crosses Parallel Plates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy of an electron accelerated across parallel plates with a potential difference of 150V. The initial calculation mistakenly treats the electric field strength as energy rather than force, leading to an incorrect kinetic energy value of 3e-15 J instead of the correct 2.4e-17 J. It is clarified that the kinetic energy gained by a charge Q accelerated through a potential difference X is given by the formula Q times X. The misunderstanding highlights the importance of correctly interpreting units in physics calculations. Overall, the correct approach emphasizes the relationship between potential difference and kinetic energy for charged particles.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated from rest across a set of parallel plates that have a potential difference of 150V and are separated by 0.80 cm.

a) Determine the kinetic energy of the electron after it crosses the plates


Homework Equations


N/C = J/C/d


The Attempt at a Solution


+++++++++++++++++ delta => {(150 V), (0.8 cm)}

e (going up)
----------------------

150 J/C / (0.8 cm * 1 m / 100 cm) = 18750 N/C

So at the start it has about 18750 N/C * e of potential energy, all which transfers to kinetic energy at the end, meaning it has 18750 N/C * e of kinetic energy at the end point

18750 N/C * 1.6 * 10^-19 C

and I get an answer of 3e-15 J.

However, the book lists 2.4 * 10^-17 J. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x86 said:

Homework Statement


An electron is accelerated from rest across a set of parallel plates that have a potential difference of 150V and are separated by 0.80 cm.

a) Determine the kinetic energy of the electron after it crosses the plates


Homework Equations


N/C = J/C/d
That should be N/C = J/C/m

The Attempt at a Solution


+++++++++++++++++ delta => {(150 V), (0.8 cm)}

e (going up)
----------------------

150 J/C / (0.8 cm * 1 m / 100 cm) = 18750 N/C

So at the start it has about 18750 N/C * e of potential energy, all which transfers to kinetic energy at the end, meaning it has 18750 N/C * e of kinetic energy at the end point
A quantity with units of N/C time a quantity with units of charge, gives a quantity with units of N, i.e. a Force, not energy.

18750 N/C * 1.6 * 10^-19 C

and I get an answer of 3e-15 J.

However, the book lists 2.4 * 10^-17 J. What did I do wrong?
 
SammyS said:
That should be N/C = J/C/m


A quantity with units of N/C time a quantity with units of charge, gives a quantity with units of N, i.e. a Force, not energy.

Thank you for your help. I can't believe I didn't notice that. I guess it's time for a break! :P
 
x86 said:
Thank you for your help. I can't believe I didn't notice that. I guess it's time for a break! :P

Yes.

An object of charge, Q, when accelerated through a potential difference of X Volts, will gain (Q times X) Joules of Kinetic Energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top