How Is the Depth of the Potential Well Calculated for Free Electrons in Gold?

Dawei
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For free electrons in a metal, the depth of a potential well can be determined by observing that the work function is the energy required to remove an electron at the top of the occupied states from the metal; an electron in this state has the Fermi energy.

Assuming each atom provides one free electron to the gas, find the depth of the well for a free electron in gold (work function = 4.8 eV)

Homework Equations



5afda697888e24366242dd110d4c7d76.png


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm assuming that the answer will be just the fermi energy plus the work function, but I can't seem to get the right answer when plugging everything in.

For N/V, I used (Avogadro # x Density of gold) / (molar mass of gold) , and got 3.89 x 10^9 electrons / cubic meter

The answer should be on the order of 1 ev, but I can't seem to get this. The m here refers to the mass of a single electron, correct? But using that, I just don't get the right orders of magnitude. (I get about 5 x 10^6).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That isn't nearly enough electrons in a cubic meter. You made a mistake in calculating N/V. Please show all of your work so we can see what you did wrong.
 
Yeah you're right. 10^9 was what I got when I took number of electrons / m^3 and raised it to the 1/3 power, to get N/L. I think I'm supposed to use the 1 dimensional equation.

edit: yeah I was just being dumb, I had it right, was just using the wrong units for mass. Thanks though.
 
Last edited:
You have the right equation. Just show your work on solving N/V so we can check it. Remember to show all units.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top