How Is the Derivative of Basis Vectors Computed in Polar Coordinates?

Mathematicsresear
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am unsure as to how the partial derivative of the basis vector e_r with respect to theta is (1/r)e_theta in polar coordinates

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


differentiating gives me -sin(theta)e_x+cos(theta)e_y however I'm not sure how to get 1/r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't get a factor of 1/r. Why do you think there is one?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Chestermiller
vela said:
You shouldn't get a factor of 1/r. Why do you think there is one?
Based on some of his other threads, he is not using normalised basis vectors but ##\vec e_i = \partial_i \vec x## (which I usually would denote ##\vec E_i## or similar to underline that they are not necessarily unit vectors - however, there are some places in the literature where ##\vec e_i## is used and instead ##\hat i## or similar is used for normalised basis vectors). With my preferred notation, where ##\vec e_i## are normalised and ##\vec E_i = \partial_i \vec x##, you would have ##\vec E_r = \vec e_r## but ##\vec E_\theta = r \vec e_\theta## so indeed you would have ##\partial_\theta \vec E_r = \vec E_\theta/r##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top