How Is the Magnetic Field Calculated in the Normal Zeeman Effect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field strength in the Normal Zeeman Effect using the Balmer series red line of hydrogen, which splits into three spectral lines under a magnetic field. The wavelength of the red line is 656.5 nm, and the observed splitting is 0.065 nm. Participants highlight the need to convert wavelength differences into energy values to correctly apply the equation E = E0 + μB × B × ml. There is confusion regarding the relationship between energy and wavelength changes, emphasizing that ΔE does not equal hc/Δλ. The correct approach involves using the appropriate equations and constants to derive the magnetic field value accurately.
dinospamoni
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The red line of the Balmer series in hydrogen has a
wavelength of 656.5 nm. Suppose that this line is observed to
split into three different spectral lines when placed in a magnetic field, B, due to the Normal Zeeman Effect. What is the
value of the magnetic field if the wavelength splitting between
adjacent lines is 0.065 nm?


Homework Equations



\mu_{B}\ =\ 9.27400899(37)\ \times\ 10^{-24}\ J\ T^{-1}

E=E_0+\mu_B\times B\times m_l

The Attempt at a Solution



I said that E - E0 = .065 nm

and solved for B, saying m_l = 1, but that's not right.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E is an energy, nm is a length and not an energy. You can convert the wavelength values to energy values, then it will work.
 
Ah right good catch. I tried that and got 3.3*10^8 T, but that was wrong too.

i did E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

where \lambda is .065 nm

than divided by \mu_B
 
Note that ##E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}## does not imply that ##\Delta E = \frac{hc}{\Delta \lambda}##.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top