How Is the Value of 'm' Determined in Interference Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hyde2042
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the value of 'm' in the context of interference equations related to the thickness of a polymer film. The original poster seeks clarification on how to select the appropriate integer value for 'm' in the equation involving the wavelength and the index of refraction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions how to determine the value of 'm' and expresses uncertainty about the use of different integer values. Some participants provide insights into the flexibility of 'm' as any integer, while others discuss the implications of using '0' versus higher integers like '1' or '2'.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the value of 'm'. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of '0' and its implications for the reflectance spectrum, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the choice of 'm' may depend on practical considerations, such as the thickness of the coating and its effect on reflectance across different wavelengths. There is an acknowledgment of the relationship between the thickness and the wavelength in the context of the interference pattern.

hyde2042
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://i.imgur.com/xrba7.png


Homework Equations


I'm using this equation to find the thickness of the polymer.

[(m+(1/2)) λ = 2nt] (where "n" is the index of refraction and "t" is the thickness )


The Attempt at a Solution



I just want to know how m is determined. I've learned everything else, but I missed the first day on which m value to use and it's always just slipped my mind whenever I'm in class or lab.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m is any integer, including zero. ehild
 
Thanks, but I'm still unsure as to why "0" is used in the solution instead of "1" or "2".
 
hyde2042 said:
Thanks, but I'm still unsure as to why "0" is used in the solution instead of "1" or "2".

First: it is easier to make a thinner coating then a thick one.

Second: The reflectance depends on the wavelength, this function is about the form R=A+Bcos(4piND/lambda) (N is the refractive index, D the thickness). If the reflectance is zero at a specific wavelength, it stays low in the broadest wavelength range when D has the smallest possible value.
The figure shows the reflectance spectrum of two coatings, one 100 nm, the other 300 nm thick. Both have zero reflectance at 600 nm.


ehild
 

Attachments

  • antirefl.jpg
    antirefl.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 418

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K