How Long Does It Take for a Child to Swing Back and Forth on a Tire Swing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xnitexlitex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a child to swing back and forth on a tire swing suspended from two tree branches at different heights. The higher branch is 9.45 m above the ground, while the lower branch is 5.58 m, with the swing's bottom positioned at 0.46 m above the ground. The participants debate the correct approach to finding the center of mass and determining the effective lengths of the pendulum during the swing's motion. They suggest that the swing behaves as a long pendulum initially and then as a short pendulum when it contacts the lower branch, complicating the calculation of the swing's period. The conversation highlights the need for clear information and possibly a diagram to resolve the ambiguities in the problem.
xnitexlitex
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A horizontal tree branch is directly above another horizontal tree branch. The elevation of the higher branch is 9.45 m above the ground, and the elevation of the lower branch is 5.58 m above the ground. Some children decide to use the two branches to hold a tire swing. One end of the tire swing's rope is tied to the higher tree branch so that the bottom of the tire swing is 0.46 m above the ground. This swing is thus a restricted pendulum. Starting with the complete length of the rope at an initial angle of 14.6° with respect to the vertical, how long does it take a child of mass 28.5 kg to complete one swing back and forth?


Homework Equations



T=2∏√I/mgd

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the T=2∏√I/mgd equation, but I'm having trouble finding d because I don't know where the center of mass is. Also, What branch would I use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did this problem come with a picture? It sounds to me that at the bottom of the swing the rope then comes in contact with the lower branch and this branch becomes the new pivot point. If that is the case then the period would be double the time it takes the child to reach the bottom of the swing + double the time it takes the child to reach their peak height when the pivot changes to the lower branch (the doubling comes from the symmetry of the pendulum).
 
I agree with JHamm. Unless there is some essential information missing I think this is a long pendulum for 1/2 of the cycle and a short pendulum for the other 1/2.
I make the length of the long pendulum 8.99m and the length of the short pendulum 5.12m.
The time period for a pendulum is a straight forward expression.
T = 2∏√l/g
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top