How Long Does It Take for a High-Resistance RLC Circuit to Lose Half Its Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a high-resistance RLC circuit to lose half its energy. The initial equations derived include the total energy stored in the circuit, expressed as Etot= Ao^2 [(L+CR^2)/2LC] exp(-2Rt/L). The key point is that when setting the energy to half its initial value, the time can be calculated as t= (L/2R)ln(2), which indicates that higher resistance leads to a shorter time for energy dissipation. The conversation also clarifies the correct form of the angular frequency and confirms the validity of the energy decay formula. Ultimately, the findings suggest that energy dissipation occurs more rapidly in high-resistance scenarios compared to low-resistance cases.
Nivlac2425
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a simple RLC circuit. If R >> (4L)/C , compute approximately how long it takes for the circuit to lose half of the initial energy stored in the system.

(There is no circuit drawing given; the problem assumes a general RLC circuit)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have already worked out the differential equation that is associated with RLC circuits, and got an expression for

ω=[iR±sqrt(4L/C - R2)]/(2L)

and since R >> (4L)/C ,

ω= 0, (iR)/L

We consider the non-trivial case, ω= (iR)/L
Then it turns out that

Q=Aoexp(-Rt/L) , and

dQ/dt = I = -R/L Aoexp(-Rt/L)

From these, I solved for the total energy stored in the RLC system (capacitor energy + inductor energy) and got:

Etot= Ao2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] exp(-2Rt/L)

Then at this point, I'm sort of stuck and not sure where to go. Although I can derive the average power in a cycle by:

P= Etot/tdiss = Ao2(R/L)[(L+CR2)/2LC]exp(-2Rt/L)
where tdiss is the energy dissipation time, equal to L/R

From here, I can integrate the power expression to come up with a relation between the energy and initial energy,

E= (Eo/2)exp(-2t/tdiss)

And then, finally attempting to answer the question, I set E=Eo/2 and get t=0.

Somehow this doesn't make much sense to me and makes me believe that I did something very wrong in my work above. In my class lecture notes, a similar derivation was done assuming that the resistance was small (R << (4L)/C), but now the resistance is huge.

From inspection, I can see that the current through the circuit must be very small and that perhaps the capacitor is discharging very slowly as well. But what does this mean about the energy dissipation? Assuming that my derivation above is correct (it is probably not), the circuit can only store half of the total energy predicted from the Etot expression.

Can anyone make some sense of this?
Thanks! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nivlac2425 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I have already worked out the differential equation that is associated with RLC circuits, and got an expression for

ω=[iR±sqrt(4L/C - R2)]/(2L)

and since R >> (4L)/C ,

ω= 0, (iR)/L

We consider the non-trivial case, ω= (iR)/L
Then it turns out that

Q=Aoexp(-Rt/L) , :

You lost a factor 2 from the denominator of ω

ehild
 
ehild said:
You lost a factor 2 from the denominator of ω

ehild

Thanks for the reply,
I believe it was

ω=(iR±iR)/2L, (after using R>>(4L)/C

ω=2iR/2L

ω=iR/L

Correct me if I'm wrong with this

Thanks!
 
Nivlac2425 said:
Q=Aoexp(-Rt/L) , and

dQ/dt = I = -R/L Aoexp(-Rt/L)

From these, I solved for the total energy stored in the RLC system (capacitor energy + inductor energy) and got:

Etot= Ao2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] exp(-2Rt/L)

Then at this point, I'm sort of stuck and not sure where to go.

You are right, Q(t)=Aoexp(-Rt/L)
The formula you got for the total energy at time t is also correct:

Etot= Ao2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] exp(-2Rt/L). The initial stored energy is Etot(0)=Ao2 isn't it? The question is at what time becomes the energy half of the initial value.

ehild
 
ehild said:
You are right, Q(t)=Aoexp(-Rt/L)
The formula you got for the total energy at time t is also correct:

Etot= Ao2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] exp(-2Rt/L). The initial stored energy is Etot(0)=Ao2 isn't it? The question is at what time becomes the energy half of the initial value.

ehild

At t=0, Etot(0)= Ao2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] ?
I thought this would be true since exp(-2Rt/L) is the exponential decay term and the "coefficient" would be the initial value. Setting t=0 also makes the exp term become 1.

Assuming this is true, I could set Etot= Eo/2 where Eo is the intial energy, and solve for time t.

I would get

Ao2/2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] = Ao2 [(L+CR2)/2LC] exp(-2Rt/L)

and t= (L/2R)ln(2) , or t= (tdiss/2) ln(2) when tdiss=L/R

Comparing this to the solution for small resistance, it takes a shorter amount of time to drain the energy to half when we have a large resistance. This somehow makes more sense than my previous solution
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top