How Long Until the Oscillator's Energy Halves?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for the energy of an oscillating mass-spring system to reduce to half its initial value due to a frictional effect. The period of oscillation is given as 0.820 seconds, and the amplitude decreases by a factor of 0.985 with each complete oscillation. A proposed method involves using the relationship between amplitude and energy, where the energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude. The suggested approach is to determine the new amplitude after several oscillations and then calculate the time based on the period. The conversation emphasizes finding a straightforward solution without complex calculus.
NAkid
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass M is suspended from a spring and oscillates with a period of 0.820s. Each complete oscillation results in an amplitude reduction of a factor of 0.985 due to a small velocity dependent frictional effect. Calculate the time it takes for the total energy of the oscillator to decrease to 0.500 of its initial value.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Tried .985^t = .5, then t = log(.5)/log(.985) but this didn't work... any other suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NAkid said:
... any other suggestions?

Try a direct and simple approach, without calculus. The total E of the spring is (1/2)kA^2, where A is the amplitude. For the energy to become E/2, you can find A.

After each oscillation, it becomes cA, where c = 0.985. If it starts out with amplitude A0 and energy E0, then you can calculate after how many swings the energy becomes E0, by using the above mentioned process. Then find the time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top