How Many Diffraction Orders Are Visible with a 5000 Lines/cm Grating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter clockworks204
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
When light of wavelength 632.8 nm is incident on a 5000 lines/cm grating, the diffraction order can be calculated using the formula m(λ) = d(sinθ). The grating spacing is determined to be d = 2 x 10^-6 m, leading to a calculation of sinθ = 0.3164. The maximum diffraction order, n, is found to be 3, as sinθ cannot exceed 1. Consequently, there are three beams on either side of the central beam, totaling seven visible diffraction orders. This confirms that the maximum observable orders correspond to four distinct diffraction orders.
clockworks204
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
1. Light of wavelength 632.8nm is normally incident upon a grating of 5000 lines/cm. How many different diffraction orders can be seen in transmission?



2. m(lambda)=d(sintheta)



3. According to my text, d=1/5000lines/cm = 2x10^-6m
and sintheta= lambda/d = 632.8x10^-9/ 2x10^6 = .3164
If I take sin^-1(.3164), I get 18 degrees.
From here, I don't know what to do because the answer is that 7 beams exist, corresponding to 4 orders, and I don't know how to get to that answer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sinθ = mλ/d.

λ/d = 0.3164. sinθ cannot be more than 1. So m should be 3. Hence there are 3 beams on either side and one central beam.
 
Thanks for your reply. Although I understand what you are saying about the 3 beams on each side with one central, how do you derive that explanation from 0.3164?
 
clockworks204 said:
Thanks for your reply. Although I understand what you are saying about the 3 beams on each side with one central, how do you derive that explanation from 0.3164?
sinθ = nλ/d. if n = 3
sinθ = 3*λ/d = 3*0.3164 = 0.9492< 1. So n cannot be more than 3.
 
Thanks, I understand now.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top