How Much Energy Is Needed to Convert Ice at -108°C to Water Vapor at 1108°C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert 10.0 g of ice at -108°C to water vapor at 1108°C, the total energy required is calculated using specific heats and heats of fusion and vaporization. The initial calculations yielded 50.43 kJ, which did not match any multiple-choice answers provided. Participants suggested that either the problem statement might contain errors or the calculations need re-evaluation. Despite checking the values, the original poster found no discrepancies. Ultimately, the closest correct answer chosen was in the 30 kJ range.
zhen
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
question:
How much energy in kilojoules is required to convert 10.0 g of ice at -108 to water vapor at 1108°C? Specific heats are 2.09 J/g K for both ice and water vapor, and 4.18 J/g K for liquid water. Heats of vaporization and fusion are 2260 and 335 J/g.

This is what I did:
10g*108C*2.09J/g K + 10g * 335J/g + 10g*100C * 4.18 J/g K + 10g * 2260 J/g + 1008C * 10g * 2.09 J/g K= 50434.4 J =50.43 kJ

This question is a multiple choice, and there is no such choice, so this answer must be wrong. Unfortunately, I really don't know what is wrong with that.

I only the total energy is equal to the heat required to change the -108c ice to 0 C; then plus the energy require to melt the ice and then so far and so on...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, i find your answers convincing though I have not claculated exactly. yo have missed no equation.
 
vaishakh said:
Well, i find your answers convincing though I have not claculated exactly. yo have missed no equation.
I don't think I missed any equation,(maybe there are, but I really can not think of one), and there is no mistake in the calculation.
 
zhen said:
question:
(snip)2.09 J/g K for both ice and water vapor, (snip)

You'll want to "check" this value. Either the problem statement included incorrect information, or you've misread something somewhere.
 
Bystander said:
You'll want to "check" this value. Either the problem statement included incorrect information, or you've misread something somewhere.
i check it, there is nothing wrong.
so... i think there is something wrong in the question.
I choose the closest answer which is 30 somthing, and that is correct...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top