How Much Kinetic Energy is Lost

AI Thread Summary
A 2.00-kg object collides with a 3.00-kg object, resulting in a velocity change for the 2.00-kg object to 5.00 m/s west. The problem involves using conservation of momentum and energy to determine the kinetic energy lost during the collision, which is calculated to be 458J. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the classification of the collision as elastic or inelastic. It emphasizes that inelastic means not perfectly elastic and suggests using momentum conservation to find velocities and kinetic energy before and after the collision. Ultimately, the problem was successfully solved using these principles.
RPascal206
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.00-kg object traveling east at 20.0 m/s collides with a 3.00-kg object traveling west at 10.0 m/s. After the collision, the 2.00-kg object has a velocity 5.00 m/s to the west. How much kinetic energy was lost during the collision? (no image was given).


Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum, and conservation of energy.

Also, the correct answer is supposed to be 458J


The Attempt at a Solution


What bothers me the most about this problem is that it seems to be neither an inelastic, nor an elastic collision. Basically what I have tried so far involves solving for the objects final velocity (I used conservation of momentum for this), and then plugging that value into conservation of energy (i.e. Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf).

Am I supposed to be using calculus in some way? (I'm taking a calculus based physics course).

Any input would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you in advance to everyone! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RPascal206 said:
What bothers me the most about this problem is that it seems to be neither an inelastic, nor an elastic collision.
It's always a bit confusing, but the usual definition is that 'inelastic' just means 'not perfectly elastic'. (Personally, it would seem more natural to keep it for completely inelastic, everything else being various degrees of elastic.)
Basically what I have tried so far involves solving for the objects final velocity (I used conservation of momentum for this), and then plugging that value into conservation of energy (i.e. Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf).
But you know work is probably not conserved. Use momentum conservation and the other facts you are given to deduce the velocities, and hence KE before and after.
 
Thank you so much, I was able to solve the problem!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top