How Much Pressure Is Needed to Launch a Marble at 5 m/s?

AI Thread Summary
To launch a marble at 5 m/s using compressed air, the user needs to determine the appropriate pressure for their cannon setup. They initially consider using the energy equation E = Volume x Pressure but express uncertainty about its application. Discussions highlight that as the air is released, the pressure and thus the force exerted will decrease, complicating calculations without calculus. Suggestions include approximating pressure changes linearly or quadratically for a rough estimate. Accurate calculations, however, would require integration, which the user has not yet learned.
Fifty
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I need to make a cannon that fires a marble. It must be accurate and adjustable enough to hit targets of varying distance and through varying obstacles. For propellant, I want to use compressed air, for which I have an apparatus (valve from a bike tire attached to a PVC cylinder roughly fifteen centimetres long. The cylinder is about five centimetres wide. A quick release valve attached to a string will be the trigger mechanism.

The question is, how much pressure should I load the tank up with to shoot a 5.4 g marble at around 5 metres per second?

My first thought was to use energy: E = Volume(V) x Pressure(P), but I am not sure this is the correct way to do this, mainly because I haven't actually learned this equation in physics class, but I came up with it based on unit analysis during chemistry class. I am not sure what assumptions are made by the equation for example.

My best attempt:

Atmospheric pressure in my classroom is about 14.7 PSI (we measured this in our chemistry class just across the hall) and all of the compressed air will be discharged after every shot. Or rather, enough air will leave the cylinder such that the pressure inside the tank is equal to the pressure outside the tank. If the seal is totally air tight and the pressure perfectly equalizes, the Kinetic energy of the marble after leaving the barrel should be equal to the volume of the cylinder times the difference in pressure (initial pressure in tank minus atmospheric pressure).

Is this correct? Again note that I haven't actually learned this formally.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gas equation is PV=RT, where R is a constant.

I think the best approach is to use the force equation to get an acceleration and then integrate this over the distance of the barrel.

If the marble has a cross sectional area A cm and the pressure differential is P, then the acceleration is

a = F/m = AP/m. The velocity is then V = (1/2) a t^2

I hope this helps.
 
Mentz114 said:
The gas equation is PV=RT, where R is a constant.

I think the best approach is to use the force equation to get an acceleration and then integrate this over the distance of the barrel.

I haven't learned any calculus yet.

If the marble has a cross sectional area A cm and the pressure differential is P, then the acceleration is

a = F/m = AP/m. The velocity is then V = (1/2) a t^2

I hope this helps.

But won't the acceleration change as pressure is released? Initially, the air will push with maximum force, but as the volume increases, won't the pressure the air exerts decrease and thus the force the air exerts? This means I can't use linear equations to solve for the final velocity. I get the idea from my teachers that this can be done with calculus, but I have not learned calculus yet.
 
Fifty said:
I haven't learned any calculus yet.



But won't the acceleration change as pressure is released? Initially, the air will push with maximum force, but as the volume increases, won't the pressure the air exerts decrease and thus the force the air exerts? This means I can't use linear equations to solve for the final velocity. I get the idea from my teachers that this can be done with calculus, but I have not learned calculus yet.
I can see that not having calculus is a difficulty here. You could try getting an approximate result by assuming the pressure falls linearly or quadratically and finding an average. But I can't see how to get a more accurate estimate without integrating. I'll think about it.

Maybe someone else has a better idea ?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top