How Much Rope is Needed for Towing a Plankton Net at a Specific Depth?

Natedogg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a boat moving at 2.3 mph towing a plankton net in water weighting 8.5lbs. I want the net to be towed at a depth of 10m from the surface. How much rope do I need to let out from the boat?

Homework Equations


basic trig sin=cos=tan



The Attempt at a Solution


I cannot find the angle of the rope in the water from the surface of the water.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In general the answer will depend on the actual dynamics of the net and water. How many simplifying assumptions are we allowed to make?

The net has some weight so there's a force going down, it might have some buoyancy so there could be a (smaller) force pointing up, there's the tension in the rope pointing towards the boat, and there might be drag forces due to the water (let's not talk about turbulence!) pointing backwards away from the direction of motion. Which, if any, of these are we allowed to neglect?
 
Thanks for the response. Basically in a perfect world you could use all the parameters to calculate this but for the matter of getting an estimate I think we could neglect the turbulence and maybe tension. I'm am by now means a physics major but this problem is going to be used in current sampling techniques.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top