How Much Sand Equals the Surface Area of a Cube?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of sand grains needed to match the surface area of a cube measuring 1.1 m on each side. The surface area of the cube is determined to be 7.26 m², while the surface area of a single grain of sand is calculated as 31,416 µm². The number of grains required to equal the cube's surface area is found to be approximately 231 million. However, a discrepancy arises in the final weight calculation, where the multiplication in step 7 is incorrectly computed, leading to an incorrect mass of 315 g instead of the correct 418 g. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in calculations and the potential impact of rounding errors.
djkinney
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Grains of fine California beach sand are approximately spheres with an average radius of 50 μm and are made of silicon dioxide, which has a density of 2.6 × 103 kg/m3. What mass of sand grains would have a total surface area (the total area of all the individual spheres) equal to the surface area of a cube 1.1 m on an edge?


2. The attempt at a solution

1) First, find the surface area of the cube:
A = 6s² = 6 * (1.1 m)² = 7.26 m²
2) Next, find the surface area of one sand grain:
A = 4∏r² = 4∏ * (50 µm)² = 31,416 µm²
3) How many grains of sand equal the area of the cube.
7.26 m²/ 31,416 µm² * (1,000,000 µm/m)² = 231,092,437 grains of sand
4) Find the volume of one grain of sand.
V = (4/3)∏r³ = (4/3)∏(50 µm)³ = 523,599 µm³
5) How many grains of sand is in that cube weigh 2600 kg.
1.00 m³/523,598 µm³ * (1,000,000 µm/m)³ = 1,909,859,228,000 pieces of sand weighs 2600 kg
6) How much does each piece of sand weigh.
2600 kg/1,909,859,228,000 pieces * 1000 g/kg = 1.36E-6 g
7) How much does 231,092,437 grains of sand weigh?
1.81 E -6 g * 231,092,437 = 315 g

Okay, now the problem is that it says my answer is wrong!? I must have done something wrong. I'm thinking that maybe in step 5 where I rounded the last 1,909,859,228,"000" three digits off. Is this that big of a problem to throw my answer off? If not can you help me find what I did wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check it all, but the logic looks correct. However, you multiplied wrong in step 7.
1.81*2.31 = 4.18
 
phyzguy said:
I didn't check it all, but the logic looks correct. However, you multiplied wrong in step 7.
1.81*2.31 = 4.18

Wait why would I do that?
 
I'm saying that in your last step, 1.81 E -6 g * 231,092,437 = 418g, not 315g.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top