How Much Sand Equals the Surface Area of a Cube?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of sand grains needed to match the surface area of a cube measuring 1.1 m on each side. The surface area of the cube is determined to be 7.26 m², while the surface area of a single grain of sand is calculated as 31,416 µm². The number of grains required to equal the cube's surface area is found to be approximately 231 million. However, a discrepancy arises in the final weight calculation, where the multiplication in step 7 is incorrectly computed, leading to an incorrect mass of 315 g instead of the correct 418 g. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in calculations and the potential impact of rounding errors.
djkinney
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Grains of fine California beach sand are approximately spheres with an average radius of 50 μm and are made of silicon dioxide, which has a density of 2.6 × 103 kg/m3. What mass of sand grains would have a total surface area (the total area of all the individual spheres) equal to the surface area of a cube 1.1 m on an edge?


2. The attempt at a solution

1) First, find the surface area of the cube:
A = 6s² = 6 * (1.1 m)² = 7.26 m²
2) Next, find the surface area of one sand grain:
A = 4∏r² = 4∏ * (50 µm)² = 31,416 µm²
3) How many grains of sand equal the area of the cube.
7.26 m²/ 31,416 µm² * (1,000,000 µm/m)² = 231,092,437 grains of sand
4) Find the volume of one grain of sand.
V = (4/3)∏r³ = (4/3)∏(50 µm)³ = 523,599 µm³
5) How many grains of sand is in that cube weigh 2600 kg.
1.00 m³/523,598 µm³ * (1,000,000 µm/m)³ = 1,909,859,228,000 pieces of sand weighs 2600 kg
6) How much does each piece of sand weigh.
2600 kg/1,909,859,228,000 pieces * 1000 g/kg = 1.36E-6 g
7) How much does 231,092,437 grains of sand weigh?
1.81 E -6 g * 231,092,437 = 315 g

Okay, now the problem is that it says my answer is wrong!? I must have done something wrong. I'm thinking that maybe in step 5 where I rounded the last 1,909,859,228,"000" three digits off. Is this that big of a problem to throw my answer off? If not can you help me find what I did wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check it all, but the logic looks correct. However, you multiplied wrong in step 7.
1.81*2.31 = 4.18
 
phyzguy said:
I didn't check it all, but the logic looks correct. However, you multiplied wrong in step 7.
1.81*2.31 = 4.18

Wait why would I do that?
 
I'm saying that in your last step, 1.81 E -6 g * 231,092,437 = 418g, not 315g.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top