How much work is done when moving a charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iceman2048
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done when moving a charge of +2e from infinity to the x-axis in the presence of two stationary charges. The user applies the superposition principle to determine the potential energy contributions from both stationary charges, resulting in a total potential energy of 1.4466E-28 J. However, a correction is made regarding the sign of the work done, clarifying that work equals the change in energy (W = ΔU) rather than its negative. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification and indicates they may seek further assistance on a different question. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding potential energy and work in electrostatics.
iceman2048
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Figure 24-60, we move a particle of charge +2e in from infinity to the x axis. How much work do we do? Distance D is 6.30 m.

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6987/fig2460.th.gif


Homework Equations


U = kQq/r
U=-W


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok since there's two stationary charges (2e and e), I figured you could use the superpositioning principle and claculate the work done to move the 2e from infinity to the x-axis against the stationary 2e plus the work done to move it against the stationary e charge. Summing them would give the answer.

U1= (k)(2e)(2e)/(2d) = 7.233E-29 J

U2 = (k)(e)(2e)/d = 7.23E-29 J

U(total) = 7.23E-29 + 7.23E-29 = 1.4466E-28 J

U = -Work
1.4466E-28 = -Work
Work = -1.4466E-28 J

Is my assumption that the superpositioning principle can be used false? Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your use of superposition is perfectly correct (although I didn't check your arithmetic). One error is in the sign of the work done: The work done equals the change in energy, in this case W = ΔU (not -ΔU).
 
Thank you very much Doc, you've saved the day once more! I just have one more question left that I'm struggling with but I'm going to try it some more. If I need help, I'll start a new thread to make everything more organized.

Thank you once again Doc!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top