How proportional action is produced in a pneumatic controller

AI Thread Summary
Proportional action in a pneumatic controller is produced through a balance of forces acting on a beam, where the output pressure varies between 0.2 to 1.0 bar based on the difference between measured and desired values. The equilibrium condition is established when the sum of torques around the pivot is zero, allowing for a mathematical relationship to be derived for output pressure. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding force and displacement balance in this context, comparing the mechanical system to an operational amplifier circuit. Additionally, the Bailey manual is recommended as a resource for deeper insights into the construction and operation of P + I + D controllers. Overall, mastering these principles is essential for effective automatic control systems.
David Deal
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


(a) With the aid of a sketch explain how proportional action is produced
in a pneumatic controller whose output is 0.2 to 1.0 bar. Assume that
the controller is direct acting.

(b) Show, mathematically, that the output is dependent on the difference
between the measured and desired values.

(c) With the aid of a well annotated sketch describe the construction and
operation of a P + I + D controller having a pneumatic output.

Homework Equations


none that I can think of

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I believe I have to produce this as the first part of the question. As my lessons are pretty poor this is all I can gather from the content.
upload_2019-3-8_13-53-0.png


(b) There is nothing that I can see in my notes for this. The tutor is as helpful as the notes also.

(c) I think this is what they are after, but again my lessons don't shed much light on this.
upload_2019-3-8_14-37-55.png


I just need pointed in the right direction and I should be good to be honest.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-3-8_13-53-0.png
    upload_2019-3-8_13-53-0.png
    14.2 KB · Views: 1,004
  • upload_2019-3-8_14-37-55.png
    upload_2019-3-8_14-37-55.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 920
Physics news on Phys.org
Try about page 17 here

http://www.instrumentationrepair.com/Documents/Manuals/Bailey/Instruments/P92-1-1.pdf

i'd download and print a copy because it takes some mental gymnastics to wrap your brain around that mechanical marvel.
The Bailey AD is a general purpose analog computer with two balance beams instead of just one as you have drawn,
but the principles of force balance and displacement balance are your basic thought tools.
 
jim hardy said:
Try about page 17 here

http://www.instrumentationrepair.com/Documents/Manuals/Bailey/Instruments/P92-1-1.pdf

i'd download and print a copy because it takes some mental gymnastics to wrap your brain around that mechanical marvel.
The Bailey AD is a general purpose analog computer with two balance beams instead of just one as you have drawn,
but the principles of force balance and displacement balance are your basic thought tools.

Thats great. Thanks for the information.

Now I have to derive an equation for Po relating to measure and desired pressures for b).
Any pointers?
 
David Deal said:
Now I have to derive an equation for Po relating to measure and desired pressures for b).
Any pointers?
well as i said force balance and displacement balance are your thought tools.

Consider forces F acting on the beam, and their distances from the pivot..

upload_2019-3-10_16-9-26.png

assume all bellows have same area.
Equilibrium is when beam is balanced exactly horizontal, as shown
consider that a minute displacement from there, less than 0.001" changes nozzle pressure hence output pressure from minimum to maximum.
and for analysis imagine it takes zero movement from equilibrium to change output pressure over full range
so the nozzle is your "null" analogous to summing junction of an operational amplifier circuit.

In my opinion the spring on right end is mis-named it should be called Bias rather than Proportioning.

Since all bellows have same area, force exerted by any of them is proportional to pressure and we don't have to write area into the force balance equations.
Force up on left end of beam equals (Pmeasured - Pdesired),
and force up on right end of beam equals (Poutput - Fbias spring)

The beam is in equilibrium when sum of torques is zero
(Pmeasured - Pdesired) X D1 = (Poutput - Fbias spring) X D2
Solve for Poutput.
(You might want to set Fbias spring = 0 for starters.)

That should give you the idea what they're up to in the "How It Operates" chapter of that Bailey instruction leaflet.

It's the mechanical analogue to an operational amplifier circuit.
D1 and D2 are analogous to input and feedback resistors
and that 0.001" displacement i mentioned is analogous to open loop gain.
The AD relay has a pressure booster with gain around 20 placed between nozzle and output to increase its "open loop gain" .ie reducing the mechanical displacement necessary to achieve full output pressure swing..

Learn this stuff .
Maintaining a null has been the basis of automatic controls since well before computers.

old jm
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-3-10_16-9-26.png
    upload_2019-3-10_16-9-26.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 740
Answer to C is in that Bailey manual.
 
jim hardy said:
Answer to C is in that Bailey manual.

Hey Jim

Thanks for the info, someone at work is very good at PID controllers also. The above solutions are correct.

I will mark this as solved now.

Thanks again
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top