How to attenuate an already amplified output?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chebyshevF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Output
AI Thread Summary
To achieve an input-output relationship at the frequency where amplification begins in a high pass filter circuit, introducing an inverting op-amp with a gain set to the inverse of the filter's gain is suggested. This approach allows for attenuation without altering the poles and zeros of the overall transfer function. A simple inverting amplifier stage can effectively reduce the output gain to the desired level. Additionally, using another capacitor in series was considered but may complicate the circuit design. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the filter's characteristics while achieving the desired output.
chebyshevF
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I have a high pass filter circuit, which I've designed from a transfer function, and from the Bode Plot, I'm getting some amplification, yet I don't want that. I just want my input=ouput at the frequency where amplification starts. How can i go about to do this?

Should i introduce another capacitor in series? A voltage follower perhaps?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
chebyshevF said:
I have a high pass filter circuit, which I've designed from a transfer function, and from the Bode Plot, I'm getting some amplification, yet I don't want that. I just want my input=ouput at the frequency where amplification starts. How can i go about to do this?

Should i introduce another capacitor in series? A voltage follower perhaps?

If you can accommodate the inversion, use an inverting opamp circuit and set the gain to 1/ the gain of the HPF circuit's gain.
 
^^Actually I tried an inverting opamp, yet didn't think of setting the gain to the inverse of my HPF circuit's gain. I don't understand why though? So it swaps the pole and zero that i have, hence i get new capacitor values..i can't quite put my 'finger' on it but it kinda makes sense.
 
chebyshevF said:
^^Actually I tried an inverting opamp, yet didn't think of setting the gain to the inverse of my HPF circuit's gain. I don't understand why though? So it swaps the pole and zero that i have, hence i get new capacitor values..i can't quite put my 'finger' on it but it kinda makes sense.

A simple inverting amp stage after the output of your filter should not affect any poles or zeros of the total transfer function. If the gain of your filter is x2, just make the gain of your inverting amp stage -1/2.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top