How to Calculate a 3x3 Rotation Matrix around a Given Axis?

yanyin
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi, if i want to find a 3x3 matrix R which represents a rotation of Pi/6 around the axis of rotation v(vector)={1, 2, 3}. how can i find it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that your axis is along a vector that starts at the origin of the coordinate system and has its tip at the point (x,y,z)=(1,2,3)? And is your rotation direction clockwise or counterclockwise as viewed from the perspective of (0,0,0)?
 
Originally posted by Janitor
Are you saying that your axis is along a vector that starts at the origin of the coordinate system and has its tip at the point (x,y,z)=(1,2,3)? And is your rotation direction clockwise or counterclockwise as viewed from the perspective of (0,0,0)?
Thanks. it's a vector from origin to (1, 2, 3). which direction? i am not sure yet. let say clockwise.
 
Start by figuring out what the result of rotating
[0,0,1]
[0,1,0]
and
[1,0,0]
are.

Once you've done that, you shouldn't have any trouble making hte matrix.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top