How to Calculate Electric Flux through a Pyramid's Slanted Surfaces?

shinobi12
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pyramid with horizontal square base, 6.00 m on each side, and a hieght of 4.00 m is placed in a vertical electric field of 52.0 N/C. Calculate the total electric flux through the pyramid's four slanted surfaces.


Homework Equations



Phi = E*A*cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
shinobi12 said:
A pyramid with horizontal square base, 6.00 m on each side, and a hieght of 4.00 m is placed in a vertical electric field of 52.0 N/C. Calculate the total electric flux through the pyramid's four slanted surfaces.

Hi shinobi12! :smile:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :smile:
 
i found the length of the of the hypotenuse and found the area of the side and I am having trouble figuring out the angle of the area vector and the electric field vector
 
shinobi12 said:
i found the length of the of the hypotenuse and found the area of the side and I am having trouble figuring out the angle of the area vector and the electric field vector

Hint: what is the relationship between the flux through the four slanted surfaces, and the flux through the base? :wink:
 
think of flux as flowing water. what is the net flow of water through the walls of the pyramid?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top