How to calculate Pauli matrix commutators

AI Thread Summary
To calculate Pauli matrix commutators, start by using the known Pauli matrices instead of arbitrary matrices. The commutator [A, B] is defined as AB - BA, while the anticommutator {A, B} is AB + BA. When computing the commutator of two Pauli matrices, such as [σ1, σ2], the result should yield 2iε_{abc}σ_c, where ε_{abc} is the Levi-Civita symbol. Understanding the values of ε_{12c} will help identify the non-zero outcomes. Following this method will clarify the relationships and patterns in the calculations.
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to write down the Pauli matrices? Do you know what the commutator [A,B] and anticommutator {A,B} stand for? How about the Levi-Civita symbol \epsilon_{abc}?
 
hey, I know how what Pauli matrices are, and I know [a, b], but I don't know {a, b}. I know Levi-Civita as well. I tried to do matrix multiplication [a,b]=a*b-b*a, but that did not lead me anywhere.

As matrices, I wrote down arbitrary values such as a=[a1,a2],[a3,a4] and b=[b1,b2],[b3,b4]
 
The anti-commutator is just {A,B} = AB+BA. I'm not sure why you're using arbitrary matrices when the \sigma_a are the known Pauli matrices. Just compute [\sigma_1,\sigma_2], etc. and you should see more progress.
 
Wait, so are you asking how to do the first line or the second?

What the first line tells you is that when you do the commutator of 2 pauli matrices, you should get 2i\epsilon_{abc}\sigma_c.

What do you get when you find the commutator of [\sigma_1 ,\sigma_2]? What does the right hand side tell you? I'll give you a hint, \epsilon_{12c} is non-zero when c is equal to what?

For the anti-commutators, it's the same idea. You plug in various values for 'a' and 'b' and see what you get and see if the pattern you see corresponds to what the answer should be.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top