How to calculate Pauli matrix commutators

Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to write down the Pauli matrices? Do you know what the commutator [A,B] and anticommutator {A,B} stand for? How about the Levi-Civita symbol \epsilon_{abc}?
 
hey, I know how what Pauli matrices are, and I know [a, b], but I don't know {a, b}. I know Levi-Civita as well. I tried to do matrix multiplication [a,b]=a*b-b*a, but that did not lead me anywhere.

As matrices, I wrote down arbitrary values such as a=[a1,a2],[a3,a4] and b=[b1,b2],[b3,b4]
 
The anti-commutator is just {A,B} = AB+BA. I'm not sure why you're using arbitrary matrices when the \sigma_a are the known Pauli matrices. Just compute [\sigma_1,\sigma_2], etc. and you should see more progress.
 
Wait, so are you asking how to do the first line or the second?

What the first line tells you is that when you do the commutator of 2 pauli matrices, you should get 2i\epsilon_{abc}\sigma_c.

What do you get when you find the commutator of [\sigma_1 ,\sigma_2]? What does the right hand side tell you? I'll give you a hint, \epsilon_{12c} is non-zero when c is equal to what?

For the anti-commutators, it's the same idea. You plug in various values for 'a' and 'b' and see what you get and see if the pattern you see corresponds to what the answer should be.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top