How to Calculate the Correct Angle and Time to Cross a River in a Powerboat?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the correct angle and time to cross a 370-meter-wide river with a current speed of 1.7 m/s, the boat must be aimed upstream to counteract the current. The equations to determine the angle and crossing time involve vector addition, where the boat's speed relative to the river and the river's flow speed are considered. The angle can be calculated using the relationship between the boat's velocity components and the river's flow. A graphical method can help visualize this vector addition for better understanding. The overall approach emphasizes the importance of understanding relative velocities in navigation across flowing water.
mb8992
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A 370-m-wide river has a uniform flow speed of 1.7 m/s through a jungle and toward the east. An explorer wishes to leave a small clearing on the south bank and cross the river in a powerboat that moves at a constant speed of 5.6 m/s with respect to the water. There is a clearing on the north bank 93 m upstream from a point directly opposite the clearing on the south bank. (a) At what angle, measured relative to the direction of flow of the river, must the boat be pointed in order to travel in a straight line and land in the clearing on the north bank? (b) How long will the boat take to cross the river and land in the clearing?

would the equations to solve be:
t[5.6cos(theta) + 1.7] = 93
t[5.6sin(theta)] = 370

if not please help? if so how would i solve them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a neat graphical way of solving a). You just have to construct the equality \vec{v}_{B}=\vec{v}_{R}+\vec{v}_{B,R}. You know \vec{v}_{R}, you know the direction of \vec{v}_{B}, and you know the magnitude of \vec{v}_{B,R}. This is enough to construct the equation, and measure the angle.
 
i don't understand
 
Draw this out on paper - it will make more sense. I believe it is fairly simple vector addition.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top