How to Calculate the Maximum Magnetic Force on a Moving Charge in Sunlight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madd_bm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum magnetic force on a moving charge in sunlight, given an average sunlight intensity of 1390 W/m² and a charge of 1.60 x 10^-8 C. The user successfully calculated the maximum electric force as 1.637 N but struggled with the magnetic force calculation. They explored various formulas, including F = qvB and the relationship between electric and magnetic fields, ultimately arriving at a magnetic field strength of 3.41 x 10^-6 T. After correcting their approach by using the total intensity instead of the average, they recalculated and found a magnetic force of approximately 3.27 x 10^-9 N, pending confirmation of its accuracy.
madd_bm
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The average intensity of sunlight reaching the Earth is 1390 W / m2. A charge of 1.60 10-8 C is placed in the path of this electromagnetic wave.
(a) What is the magnitude of the maximum electric force that the charge experiences?
1.637 N


(b) If the charge is moving at a speed of 6.00 104 m/s, what is the magnitude of the maximum magnetic force that the charge could experience?



I got part A, but I cannot figure out what to do next:

Savg - inensity
c - speed of light 3e8
ε0 - permittivity of free space 8.854e-12
Erms

formula: Erms = √(Savg / c * ε0) = 723.3975, Erms = 1/√2 * E0
Erms / .707 = 1023.038
E0 = 1023.038
E0 * q = F
F = 1.637e-5

am I suppossed to muliply by the speed? Cause it shows a wrong answer when i do that. I cannot seem to find the right formula. I am just not sure...?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi madd_bm,

madd_bm said:

Homework Statement


The average intensity of sunlight reaching the Earth is 1390 W / m2. A charge of 1.60 10-8 C is placed in the path of this electromagnetic wave.
(a) What is the magnitude of the maximum electric force that the charge experiences?
1.637 N


(b) If the charge is moving at a speed of 6.00 104 m/s, what is the magnitude of the maximum magnetic force that the charge could experience?



I got part A, but I cannot figure out what to do next:

Savg - inensity
c - speed of light 3e8
ε0 - permittivity of free space 8.854e-12
Erms

formula: Erms = √(Savg / c * ε0) = 723.3975, Erms = 1/√2 * E0
Erms / .707 = 1023.038
E0 = 1023.038
E0 * q = F
F = 1.637e-5

For part b they want to find the magnetic force, not the electric force. What is the formula for the magnetic force on a particle? (It will have the velocity in the formula.)
 
o.k. this is what I came up with.

F = qvB

u = 1/u0 x B^2 (u0 being the permittivity of free space 4pie-7)

since u is the same as the "u" in the first equation, I used 1390 = 1/u0 x B^2 to calculate B to be 4.179e-2

then multiplied B by 1.6e-8 x 6e4 (velocity x charge) to get FB = 4.012e-5

...but this is still wrong. ?
what am I missing?

thanks again. Whatever it comes out to be I won't know if it is right until after tomorrow. I have exceeded my maximum number of tries on the question

thanks.


edit: I just thought of this and came up with a different answer:

if E = cB, then B = 3.41e-6 (c being the speed of light 3e8, E being the Electric field from part A, 1023.038)
F = qvb, then F = 3.274e-9

this might also be correct, but like I said, I will not know until tomorrow. thanks again for your help.

another edit: wait. I think I know what I did wrong. above, I used 1390 as u. I just realized this is the average intensity, not the total.
I redid the first equation (u = 1/u0 x B^2) above using the total (9.267e-6), I then followed the same steps u = 1/u0 x B^2 to calculate B using the corrected u and then set that to F= qvB and got the same answer as in the second equation: 3.27e-9
so this is likely the correct answer. I just have to wait and see...
 
Last edited:
Marked! I will come back to check this soon!thanks a lot.:-)
[PLAIN credit
immobilier simulation pret de france taux calcul
courtier[/u][/url][/color]Une simulation credit immobilier de France
a faire un
pret.[/color][PLAIN
credit immobilier simulation pret de france taux calcul
courtier[/u][/url][/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top