How to Calculate the Thickness of a Planet's Mantle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter burnout_128
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thickness
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the thickness of a planet's mantle given specific densities and radius, the discussion emphasizes using the relationships between mass, volume, and density. The total mass of the planet can be expressed as the sum of the masses of the core and mantle, while their volumes depend on their respective radii. The equations provided link the total mass and volume to the core and mantle, but the challenge lies in the lack of direct information about the core's mass or volume. The suggestion is to express the volumes in terms of the core's radius to facilitate substitution in the equations. This approach aims to derive the mantle's thickness through a systematic application of the relevant formulas.
burnout_128
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the density of the mantle to be 4700 kg/m^3, the density of the core to be 9700 kg/m^3, the radius of the planet to be 6050 km and the mean density to be 5240 kg/m^3, find the thickness of the mantle.

Homework Equations



I tried using the formula M = D * V and V = (4/3)(pie)(r^3) but there seems to be too much missing data.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an equation linking volume (and so mass) of a sphere with radius.
Now write the equation for the volume of the shell (ie mantle) which will depend on the thickness of the mantle ie, on the radius of the core.

Then you have an equation something like
overall average mass = mass of core (r_core) + mass mantle ( r_core )
 
mgb_phys said:
You have an equation linking volume (and so mass) of a sphere with radius.
Now write the equation for the volume of the shell (ie mantle) which will depend on the thickness of the mantle ie, on the radius of the core.

Then you have an equation something like
overall average mass = mass of core (r_core) + mass mantle ( r_core )

So I end up having three equations...
1) Mtotal = Vtotal * Dtotal
2) Mcore = Vcore * Dcore
3) Mmantle = Vmantle * Dmantle

1) I have the V because I am given the radius and can also figure out the M because I am given the D.
2 & 3) I only have both D's and nothing else.

I also know that: 4) Mtotal = Mcore + Mmantle
Similarly, I know that: 5) Vtotal = Vcore + Vmantle

Equations (4) and (5) seems useless as I don't have information about the mass of either the mantle or the core and don't have information about the volume of the core or mantle.

Is there some way I can substitute equations... or am I even going about it the right way?
 
You are on the right path,
Write the volumes in terms of radius of Earth and radius of Core, note the volume of core and mantle are related.
Then you can write equation 4 in terms of this core radius.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top