How to Construct Gamma Matrices in Higher Dimensions Using Sigma Matrices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter y35dp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Matricies
y35dp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If D =7 and the metric g\mu\nu=diag(+------), Using the outer product of matrices, A \otimes B construct a suitable set of \gamma matrices from the 2 x 2 \sigma-matrices

Homework Equations



\sigma1=(0, 1 ) \sigma2=(0, -i)
(1, 0) (i, 0)
\o3=(1, 0)
(0, -1)
we need only refer to the basic properties of the sigma matrices

\sigmai\sigmaj = i \epsilonijk\sigmak + \deltaijI2

and

\sigma1T=\sigma1, \sigma2T=\sigma2, \sigma3T=-\sigma3, \sigma1*=\sigma1, \sigma2*=\sigma3*=-\sigma<sub>3</sub>

The Attempt at a Solution



As of yet I have found no \gamma-matrices that satisfy {\gamma\mu, \gamma\nu} = 2g\mu\nu. The closest I have come is a set which satisfy {\gamma\mu, \gamma\nu} = 2\delta\mu\nuI7
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry those \sigma1,\sigma2,\sigma3 are supposed to be the Pauli matrices, pretty poor attempt at making matrices on my part
 
If you have a matrix that satisfies M^2 = I, there's always a matrix N that's a scalar multiple of M such that N^2 = -I.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top