How to convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents(METS)?

AI Thread Summary
To convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents (METs), there is no direct formula linking XYZ data to METs. Instead, users must reference activity-specific MET tables to find the appropriate MET value for the activity being performed. The provided formula for calculating total calories burned requires a known MET value, which can be obtained from these tables based on the activity type. While the accelerometer data can indicate intensity, it does not directly translate to METs without contextual activity information. Accurate conversion relies on understanding the specific activity associated with the accelerometer readings.
romelemperado
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how to convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents(METS)??

hi all i would like to ask if how do i convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents(METS)??

by the way I am using this formula:

Code:
[B]Total Calories Burned[/B] = Duration (in minutes) X (MET X 3.5 X weight in kg)/200
i got that formula from this site http://www.exercise4weightloss.com/calories-burned-during-exercise.html"

what i want to do is convert XYZ data to METS equivalent so that i can substitute it to METS variable in the formula above..
example if i have this data:

x: 202
y: 215
z: 5


what is the formula? I search on www but i didn't get what i need.. ;(

I knew that it is now accurate but it doesn't matter..
pls give me some idea. IM totally bad in math and physics... hehe thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


hi.. do u have any idea with this??
 


helo?
 


The problem is that there isn't a direct equivalent. You'll just have to look up the activity you were doing on a table, and use that value.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top