How to Derive the Second Expression in @Peskin Eqn 2.54?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SuperStringboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin
SuperStringboy
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am facing problem to derive the 2nd expression from the first one. My problem is the 2nd term of the 2nd expression.

Homework Equations


<br /> \int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2E_p}[\exp(-ip\cdot(x - y)) - \exp(ip\cdot (x - y))]=\int\ \frac{d^3p} {(2\pi)^3}\ \{ \frac {1}{2E_p}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\left|_{p^0 = E_p}\ +\ \frac {1}{-2E_p}\ e^{-ip.(x-y)}\left|_{p^0 = -E_p}\ \}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> p\cdot (x - y)= p^0(x^0 - y^0) - \textbf p\cdot(x-y)<br />

For Po = - Ep we can take
<br /> p\cdot (x - y)= - p^0(x^0 - y^0) - \textbf p\cdot(x-y)<br />
If i am not wrong yet, then what now?
should i change the dummy variable as p = - p? But if do it then i think another change comes d3p becomes -d3p for the 2nd term and i loose the minus sign before the 2nd term.

i don't know how much wrong i am but i am expecting good solution from you guys.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SuperStringboy said:
If i am not wrong yet, then what now?
should i change the dummy variable as p = - p? But if do it then i thing another change comes d3p becomes -d3p for the 2nd term and i loose the minus sign before the 2nd term.

The trick is that the measure d3p actually does not change sign under p -> -p.
 
Thanks Ben . But will you please explain that why the sign of d3 does not change. Is it because of spherical co-ordinates : d3p = p2sin(theta)d(theta)d(phi)dp , where p = |p| ?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top