Stargazing How to Design a Simple Telescope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alawadhi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Telescope
AI Thread Summary
Designing a simple telescope involves understanding optics and selecting the right type based on observing interests, with a recommendation for a Dobsonian reflector telescope due to its simplicity and effectiveness. For beginners, a Newtonian scope with a Dobsonian mount is suggested, as it is relatively easy to construct and affordable, with primary mirrors available for around $100. Access to woodworking tools is beneficial for building the body and mount, but the design can be bulky. While Cassegrain scopes offer compactness and higher resolution, they are more complex to build. Engaging with local astronomy clubs and utilizing online resources can provide valuable guidance and support in the telescope-building process.
Alawadhi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi and hello. I’m new here and this is my first post. How to design a telescope guys?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's a HUGE question and is something on which there is TONS of literature. Don't expect a five minute step by step set of instructions. Take the initiative! :smile: Look it up online, at the library, ask members of the local astronomy club etc. I hear some of the veteran members of those clubs even grind their own mirrors from scratch! Local science centres tend to have camps for telescope-building (if you are a kid, that is--otherwise it's a solo project for you). I have never attempted it, but I want to, when school is not so pressing. It's a great amateur project, and you will have fun. Just decide what kind of telescope best serves your observing interests and practical needs. What aperture size? What design? Reflector or refractor? Good luck man... :wink:
 
Last edited:
One needs a knowledge of optics and the physics of light.

For the best image, I would recommend a reflector telescope, and the best type appears to be a Dobson type, and something on the order of 15 inches (38 cm).

Here are some plans - http://members.aol.com/sfsidewalk/intro.htm

or http://www.willbell.com/tm/dobtel.htm

or buy a Dobson - http://telescopes.com/johndobson.htmlhttp://telescopes.com/johndobson.html

recommendation - http://www.phys.vt.edu/~jhs/dobsonian.html

Notes from John Dobson's telescope making class
http://sfsidewalkastronomers.org/telescopes/building/dobnotes

and his site - http://www.johndobson.org/index.html
and http://www.sidewalkastronomers.com/index.html

Finally, if you are obsessed - http://www.globaldialog.com/~obsessiontscp/OBHP.html :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
Finally, if you are obsessed - http://www.globaldialog.com/~obsessiontscp/OBHP.html :biggrin:

WOW...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I second Astronuc's suggestion.

If you are a first-timer, I would recommend you try your hand at a simple Newtonian (reflector) scope with a Dobsonian mount. These are reasonably uncomplicated as far as construction is concerned, and you can buy all the parts you need for about a couple of hundred dollars (US). The dominant cost is in the primary mirror - and if I recall correctly, you can buy a decent 6" or 8" mirror for about a hundred bucks. Other notable costs will be in the secondary (diagonal) mirror and in eyepieces. The body and mount can be made from relatively cheap raw materials. Access to a woodshop or woodworking tools will be most useful.

While the dobsonian is the easiest "nice" telescope to make, it has drawbacks in that the mount is usually bulky and the scope itself is fairly long (3 to 4 ft long for a 6 to 8 inch scope).

I've referred to this site, and found it quite nice.

Cassegrain scopes are much fancier (smaller for a given resolution) than Newtonian scopes but are way harder to build.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
129
Views
19K
Back
Top