How to do cross product if I have got only two coordinate?

Outrageous
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
a =(x,y), b =(h,k)
a cross b =?

I have idea what to type on google. Is that doing like matrices , a cross b = xk-hy?
thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can't. The cross product is only naturally defined for 3 dimensions and 7 dimensions. If you want to do the above cross product you would have to add a zero as a third coordinate so that those vectors are on the plane embedded in 3-space i.e. a = (x,y,0) and b = (h,k,0).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
"...naturally defined for 3 ... and 7 dimension"Does that mean no cross product can occur in 4 or 5 dimension? I have been reviewing dot and cross product in the last recent few days, and although I have not yet tried to, one would imagine in four dimensions, one could have two vectors, and set up dot product relationships to find what new vector is orthogonal (dot products are zero) to both of these two vectors.
 
symbolipoint said:
"...naturally defined for 3 ... and 7 dimension"Does that mean no cross product can occur in 4 or 5 dimension? I have been reviewing dot and cross product in the last recent few days, and although I have not yet tried to, one would imagine in four dimensions, one could have two vectors, and set up dot product relationships to find what new vector is orthogonal (dot products are zero) to both of these two vectors.
Well...yes. There is a form of "cross product" in 4 or 5 dimensional Euclidean space. Kind of.

Recall that the magnitude of the cross product ##\vec{u}\times\vec{v}## of two vectors ##\vec{u}## and ##\vec{v}## is equal to the area of the parallelogram outlined by the two vectors. That is also the magnitude of the corresponding bivector, which can be intuitively thought of as an oriented family of parallelograms. This bivector is the Hodge dual of the cross product, given by ##\vec{u}\wedge\vec{v}##. Thus, we can define the cross product by ##\vec{u}\times\vec{v}=\star\left(\vec{u}\wedge\vec{v}\right)##.

However, if you think about it, what's the difficulty of this definition? For example, what would be the cross product in ##\mathbb{R}^4##? :wink:
 
Last edited:
symbolipoint said:
"...naturally defined for 3 ... and 7 dimension"


Does that mean no cross product can occur in 4 or 5 dimension? .
Indeed dimensions 3 and 7 are the only ones that admit non-degenerate cross products (dimension 1 admits a degenerate cross product). It's a result of Hurwitz's theorem, see here (section 5): http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/linmultialg/hurwitzlinear.pdf
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top