How to Express the Angle of Rotation for a Rotated Electric Field

[unscientific]

Homework Statement

Suppose an E-field is rotated by angle ø₂. Express ø₂ in terms of:

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I used the rotation matrix, and compared LHS and RHS but it led to nowhere:
E'= RE
\left ( \begin{array}{cc} <br /> E_1&#039; sin (ky-ωt+ø_2) \\ <br /> 0 \\<br /> E_2&#039; cos (ky-ωt+ø_2)<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right )<br /> <br /> =<br /> <br /> \left ( \begin{array}{cc} <br /> cos ø_2 &amp; 0 &amp; sin ø_2 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> -sin ø_2 &amp; 0 &amp; cos ø_2<br /> \end {array}<br /> \right) <br /> <br /> \left ( \begin{array}{cc} <br /> E_1 sin (ky-ωt) \\ <br /> 0 \\<br /> E_2 cos (ky-ωt+ø_1)<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right )

 

[vanhees71]

It's a very badly post question, because it's not defined around which axis you should rotate. I guess it's the y axis from what's in the white box. You should send the complete question or ask those who have posed the problem for clarification ;-)).

This said, the behavior of the electric field under rotations is very well defined, because \vec{E} is a vector field (in the sense of 3D Euclidean space),
\vec{E}&#039;(t,\vec{r}&#039;)=\hat{R} \vec{E}(t,\vec{r})=\hat{R} \vec{E}(t,\hat{R}^{-1} \vec{r}&#039;).
The emphasis is on field, because you have to consider both the field value and the spatial argument in the transformation rule!

 

[unscientific]

It's a very badly post question, because it's not defined around which axis you should rotate. I guess it's the y axis from what's in the white box. You should send the complete question or ask those who have posed the problem for clarification ;-)).

This said, the behavior of the electric field under rotations is very well defined, because \vec{E} is a vector field (in the sense of 3D Euclidean space),
\vec{E}&#039;(t,\vec{r}&#039;)=\hat{R} \vec{E}(t,\vec{r})=\hat{R} \vec{E}(t,\hat{R}^{-1} \vec{r}&#039;).
The emphasis is on field, because you have to consider both the field value and the spatial argument in the transformation rule!

Sorry, I don't really get what you mean. Do you mean a matrix multiplication: \vec{E}&#039;(t,\vec{r}&#039;)=\hat{R} \vec{E}(t,\vec{r}) ?