How to Find Potential Energy from Force in a Particle's Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter csnsc14320
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Potential
csnsc14320
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m moves in a fixed plane along the trajectory \vec{r} = \hat{i} A cos(3 \omega t) + \hat{j} A cos(\omega t).
(a) Sketch the trajectory of the particle.
(b) Find the force acting on the particle
(c) find its potential energy
(d) find its total energy as functions of time
(e) is the motion periodic? if so, find the period

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Part (a) I won't worry about for now
Part (b): I think this is correct:
\vec{r} = \hat{i} A cos(\omega t) + \hat{j} A cos(3 \omega t).
\vec{v} = -\hat{i} A \omega sin(\omega t) - \hat{j} 3 A \omega sin(3 \omega t)
\vec{a} = -\hat{i} A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) - \hat{j} 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t})

\vec{F} = m \vec{a}
\vec{F} = m (-\hat{i} A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) - \hat{j} 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t}))

So, for part (b), this is where I'm wondering if I am correct:
F = -\frac{d U}{d t}
U = m( A \omega sin(\omega t) + 3 A \omega sin(3 \omega t))

And, if this is correct, would this be the kinetic energy as a function of time?
K(t) = \frac{1}{2} m (-\hat{i} A \omega sin(\omega t) - \hat{j} 3 A \omega sin(3 \omega t))^2
Which would make part (c):
E = \frac{1}{2} m (-\hat{i} A \omega sin(\omega t) - \hat{j} 3 A \omega sin(3 \omega t))^2 + m( A \omega sin(\omega t) + 3 A \omega sin(3 \omega t))

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
csnsc14320 said:
\vec{r} = \hat{i} A cos(\omega t) + \hat{j} A cos(\omega t).
\vec{v} = -\hat{i} A \omega sin(\omega t) - \hat{j} 3 A \omega sin(\omega t)
\vec{a} = -\hat{i} A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) - \hat{j} 9 A \omega^2 cos(\omega t})

Where are the 3 and 9 coming from?

So, for part (b), this is where I'm wondering if I am correct:
F = -\frac{d U}{d t}

The time derivative of potential energy doesn't even have units of force...Isn't Force the negative gradient of U?:wink:
 
Where are the 3 and 9 coming from?

Oops, I wrote the equation wrong. The original equation should be:

\vec{r} = \hat{i} A cos(\omega t) + \hat{j} A cos(3 \omega t)

The time derivative of potential energy doesn't even have units of force...Isn't Force the negative gradient of U?:wink:

So how would you get the potential from the force? I don't see how you can reverse the gradient
 
Well, in Cartesian coords, the gradient of some scalar function f is of course

\vec{\nabla}f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \hat{i}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \hat{j}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} \hat{k}

So if I tell you that \vec{A}=A_x\hat{i}+A_y\hat{j}+A_z\hat{k}=-\vec{\nabla}f, what can you tell me about A_x, A_y and A_z?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Well, in Cartesian coords, the gradient of some scalar function f is of course

\vec{\nabla}f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \hat{i}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \hat{j}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} \hat{k}

So if I tell you that \vec{A}=A_x\hat{i}+A_y\hat{j}+A_z\hat{k}=-\vec{\nabla}f, what can you tell me about A_x, A_y and A_z?

so...

A_x = -\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}
A_y = -\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}
A_z = -\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}

If \vec{F} = -\vec{\nabla}U
and \vec{\nabla}U=\frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \hat{i}+\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} \hat{j}+\frac{\partial U}{\partial z} \hat{k}

I have

\vec{F} =- \vec{\nabla}U = m (-\hat{i} A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) - \hat{j} 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t})) = -\frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \hat{i}-\frac{\partial U}{\partial y} \hat{j}-\frac{\partial U}{\partial z} \hat{k}

m A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) = \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}
m 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t}) = \frac{\partial U}{\partial y}
0 = \frac{\partial U}{\partial z} \hat{k}

Would I integrate the left side with respect to x and y to get

m A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) x = U_x
m 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t) y = U_y

or just

U = m A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) x + m 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t) y
 
csnsc14320 said:
m A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) = \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}
m 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t}) = \frac{\partial U}{\partial y}
0 = \frac{\partial U}{\partial z} \hat{k}

Correct :approve:

U = m A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) x + m 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t) y

There are two things you need to be careful of here:

(1) m A \omega^2 cos(\omega t) is not necessarily independent of x(t) and m 9 A \omega^2 cos(3 \omega t}) is not necessarily independent of y(t). So in order to integrate them properly, you need to determine their functional dependence on x and y first.

Hint: As always, \vec{r}(t)=x(t)\hat{i}+y(t)\hat{j}+z(t)\hat{k} so compare that to the trajectory you were given and find out what x(t) and y(t) are.

(2)If I tell you that \frac{\partial f(x,y,z)}{\partial x}=g(x,y,z) Then that means f(x,y,z)=\int g(x,y,z) dx + h(y,z) where h(y,z) is some unknown function of y and z. It does not just mean that f(x,y,z)=\int g(x,y,z) dx.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top