How to Find the Magnetic Field (B) in a Zeeman Effect

Click For Summary
To find the magnetic field (B) in a Zeeman effect experiment, it is essential to treat the magnetic field as an independent variable rather than deriving it from the data. The relationship between the magnetic field and current (I) is not simply given by the equation B = μ₀I, as the constant of proportionality may differ. Instead, a calibration curve for the magnetic field should be used to correlate current values to their corresponding magnetic field strengths. By analyzing this calibration curve, the appropriate B-field values can be determined for the current data collected. Utilizing this approach will enable accurate graphing of areal ratios (δ/Δ) as a function of the magnetic field.
Athenian
Messages
143
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
Refer below.
Relevant Equations
Not sure how relevant this equation is, but the equation below may (or may not) help:

$$\Delta E = \frac{hc}{2\mu t} \bigg(\frac{\delta}{\Delta} \bigg) = \mu_{B} B$$
I have been analyzing a set of data from a lab activity on the Zeeman effect. The data (i.e. images) gathered can be previewed via this Google drive link here.

While I am provided with the numerical data on the current (##I##), I am not provided with any data on the magnetic field. With the given data (i.e. images), I am supposed to graph areal ratios (##\delta/\Delta##) as a function of magnetic field (##B##).

Note that areal ratios (##\delta/\Delta##) are defined as the net change in area between neighboring rings (##\delta##) over the net change in area between neighboring orders (##\Delta##). These areas can be calculated by finding the "distance" of the rings in the images via a software like Gimp.

With the above information in mind, how should I find the magnetic field (##B##) and plot my graph? Or, should I use equations like ##B = \mu_{0} I## to find my answer?

Thank you for reading through this question!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am unfamiliar with the particular version of the Zeeman effect experiment that you performed. However, it goes against good practice to use your data in order to determine the external magnetic field. That's doing things backward. The magnetic field is your independent variable and there must be a way to independently determine or measure it. The magnetic field B is proportional to the current I but the constant of proportionality is not ##\mu_0##. Perhaps you missed it, but there should be a place in the writeup of your lab activity explaining how to find the relation between the field and the current. If there isn't, I recommend that you ask your lab instructor.
 
Thank you for the clarification. After searching around, there isn't an available equation in the writeup of my lab activity. However, I did end up finding the calibration curve of a magnetic field. I believe this should help?
 
Athenian said:
Thank you for the clarification. After searching around, there isn't an available equation in the writeup of my lab activity. However, I did end up finding the calibration curve of a magnetic field. I believe this should help?
It will help tremendously. Just read the graph to determine what B-field corresponds to what current.
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...