How to Find the Magnetic Field (B) in a Zeeman Effect

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the magnetic field (B) in the context of the Zeeman effect experiment. Users are advised against using experimental data to derive the magnetic field, emphasizing that B should be treated as an independent variable. Instead, it is crucial to refer to the calibration curve of the magnetic field, which correlates the magnetic field strength with the current (I). Utilizing software like Gimp to analyze images for areal ratios (δ/Δ) is also highlighted as a method to visualize data effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Zeeman effect and its experimental setup
  • Familiarity with areal ratios (δ/Δ) and their significance
  • Proficiency in using Gimp for image analysis
  • Knowledge of magnetic field calibration curves
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between magnetic field strength and current in Zeeman effect experiments
  • Learn how to create and interpret calibration curves for magnetic fields
  • Explore advanced image analysis techniques using Gimp
  • Study the theoretical foundations of the Zeeman effect and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers involved in experimental physics, particularly those studying the Zeeman effect and magnetic field measurements.

Athenian
Messages
143
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
Refer below.
Relevant Equations
Not sure how relevant this equation is, but the equation below may (or may not) help:

$$\Delta E = \frac{hc}{2\mu t} \bigg(\frac{\delta}{\Delta} \bigg) = \mu_{B} B$$
I have been analyzing a set of data from a lab activity on the Zeeman effect. The data (i.e. images) gathered can be previewed via this Google drive link here.

While I am provided with the numerical data on the current (##I##), I am not provided with any data on the magnetic field. With the given data (i.e. images), I am supposed to graph areal ratios (##\delta/\Delta##) as a function of magnetic field (##B##).

Note that areal ratios (##\delta/\Delta##) are defined as the net change in area between neighboring rings (##\delta##) over the net change in area between neighboring orders (##\Delta##). These areas can be calculated by finding the "distance" of the rings in the images via a software like Gimp.

With the above information in mind, how should I find the magnetic field (##B##) and plot my graph? Or, should I use equations like ##B = \mu_{0} I## to find my answer?

Thank you for reading through this question!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am unfamiliar with the particular version of the Zeeman effect experiment that you performed. However, it goes against good practice to use your data in order to determine the external magnetic field. That's doing things backward. The magnetic field is your independent variable and there must be a way to independently determine or measure it. The magnetic field B is proportional to the current I but the constant of proportionality is not ##\mu_0##. Perhaps you missed it, but there should be a place in the writeup of your lab activity explaining how to find the relation between the field and the current. If there isn't, I recommend that you ask your lab instructor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Athenian
Thank you for the clarification. After searching around, there isn't an available equation in the writeup of my lab activity. However, I did end up finding the calibration curve of a magnetic field. I believe this should help?
 
Athenian said:
Thank you for the clarification. After searching around, there isn't an available equation in the writeup of my lab activity. However, I did end up finding the calibration curve of a magnetic field. I believe this should help?
It will help tremendously. Just read the graph to determine what B-field corresponds to what current.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Athenian

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K