How to Find the Magnetic Field (B) in a Zeeman Effect

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the magnetic field (B) in the context of the Zeeman effect, based on data collected from a lab activity. The original poster is tasked with graphing areal ratios as a function of the magnetic field but lacks direct measurements of B.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks guidance on how to find the magnetic field using provided data and questions whether to apply specific equations. Some participants suggest that the magnetic field should be treated as an independent variable and question the appropriateness of using current data to derive B.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationship between current and magnetic field, with some suggesting the need for independent measurement of B. The original poster has found a calibration curve, which may provide a pathway to relate current to the magnetic field.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of information in the lab writeup regarding the relationship between current and magnetic field, prompting further inquiry into how to establish this connection.

Athenian
Messages
143
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
Refer below.
Relevant Equations
Not sure how relevant this equation is, but the equation below may (or may not) help:

$$\Delta E = \frac{hc}{2\mu t} \bigg(\frac{\delta}{\Delta} \bigg) = \mu_{B} B$$
I have been analyzing a set of data from a lab activity on the Zeeman effect. The data (i.e. images) gathered can be previewed via this Google drive link here.

While I am provided with the numerical data on the current (##I##), I am not provided with any data on the magnetic field. With the given data (i.e. images), I am supposed to graph areal ratios (##\delta/\Delta##) as a function of magnetic field (##B##).

Note that areal ratios (##\delta/\Delta##) are defined as the net change in area between neighboring rings (##\delta##) over the net change in area between neighboring orders (##\Delta##). These areas can be calculated by finding the "distance" of the rings in the images via a software like Gimp.

With the above information in mind, how should I find the magnetic field (##B##) and plot my graph? Or, should I use equations like ##B = \mu_{0} I## to find my answer?

Thank you for reading through this question!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am unfamiliar with the particular version of the Zeeman effect experiment that you performed. However, it goes against good practice to use your data in order to determine the external magnetic field. That's doing things backward. The magnetic field is your independent variable and there must be a way to independently determine or measure it. The magnetic field B is proportional to the current I but the constant of proportionality is not ##\mu_0##. Perhaps you missed it, but there should be a place in the writeup of your lab activity explaining how to find the relation between the field and the current. If there isn't, I recommend that you ask your lab instructor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Athenian
Thank you for the clarification. After searching around, there isn't an available equation in the writeup of my lab activity. However, I did end up finding the calibration curve of a magnetic field. I believe this should help?
 
Athenian said:
Thank you for the clarification. After searching around, there isn't an available equation in the writeup of my lab activity. However, I did end up finding the calibration curve of a magnetic field. I believe this should help?
It will help tremendously. Just read the graph to determine what B-field corresponds to what current.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Athenian

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K