How to Find x Dot as a Function of t?

  • Thread starter Thread starter commander
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dot Function
commander
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



find velocity x dot, as function of time t, for particle mass m starts x=0, t=0
subject to force where Fo and c are constants.

Fx = Fo + ct



Homework Equations



answer is

x dot =Fo/m t + c/2m t^2

The Attempt at a Solution




obviously it is just an integration.
but how does the "m" get in there.

i know this is a simple question, but the solution eludes me

i have stuff like

Fo=c=constant
F=ma
F=mv dot = m r dotdot
d=r=vt=dv/dt
x dotdot = dv/dt = F/m = a = constant

what is Fx - is the the force component in direction x , or is it a vector , ?
what is Fo - a constant, vector?

how do you add in a t


how about

Fx dt = Fo dt + ct dt

Fo = ma = m v dot

x dot = int Fo dt + int ct dt

= int dt + 1/2 c t^2
=

... and I am lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F_x is the x-component of the total force on the particle and so

F_x=ma_x=m \ddot{x}=m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}

Is that enough to get you started?
 
i think i got it ...

i did f=ma

a = f/m = x dot dotso ...

x dot = ∫ Fo/m +∫ ct/m

is that the right method ...
 
Looks fine so far (I'm assuming you're integrating over dt). What do you get?

edit- make sure you include a constant of integration.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top