How to model a non-linear pendulum with air resistance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling a non-linear pendulum with air resistance, focusing on the differential equation that incorporates a resistive force. It highlights the need for a force that changes direction, suggesting the use of k v^2 sign(v) to accurately represent damping. The main inquiry is how varying the area (A) affects damping, with references to external resources for analysis. Participants emphasize the importance of using a reliable numerical differential equation solver for accurate results. The conversation underscores the complexities of modeling damping in pendulum motion.
Omkar Vaidya
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have found a differential equation that models a non-linear pendulum with air resistance, and now I have data. I've looked at the following site for guidance on how to analyse the data. It compares the motion of a damped spring, and compares it to the motion of a damped pendulum. However, my equation involves a v^2 (or (dtheta/dt)^2. The equation in the site has v proportional to the drag force. The question I am trying to answer is "How does changing the value of A(area) affect damping?"

Homework Equations



https://prnt.sc/i6bfv0[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Omkar Vaidya said:

Homework Statement


I have found a differential equation that models a non-linear pendulum with air resistance, and now I have data. I've looked at the following site for guidance on how to analyse the data. It compares the motion of a damped spring, and compares it to the motion of a damped pendulum. However, my equation involves a v^2 (or (dtheta/dt)^2. How would I eliminate this problem?

Homework Equations



https://prnt.sc/i6bfv0[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


As already pointed out in another thread on this problem, your differential equation is incorrect. You cannot have a resistive force of ##k v^2##, because that always points one way (always either to the left or to the right). You need a force that changes direction when the pendulum reverses its motion. That can be done using ##k v^2\: \text{sign}(v) = k v |v|##.

I don't think you can "eliminate" the problem; you can only deal with it. If you have access to a good numerical DE solver, getting a reliable numerical solution should not be much of a problem. In another thread on this problem I presented solutions obtained by Maple.
 
Last edited:
Ray Vickson said:
As already pointed out in another thread on this problem, your differential equation is incorrect. You cannot have a resistive force of ##k v^2##, because that always points one way (always either to the left or to the right). You need a force that changes direction when the pendulum reverses its motion. That can be done using ##k v^2\: \text{sign}(v) = k v |v|##.

I don't think you can "eliminate" the problem; you can only deal with it. If you have access to a good numerical DE solver, getting a reliable numerical solution should not be much of a problem. In another thread on this problem I presented solutions obtained by Maple.

Yes, I think that would be my question too. I did change the v^2. However, the question I am trying to answer (sorry for not including that) is "How does changing A(area) affect damping?" That is where the site comes into use, by comparing damping coefficients.
 
Omkar Vaidya said:
Yes, I think that would be my question too. I did change the v^2. However, the question I am trying to answer (sorry for not including that) is "How does changing A(area) affect damping?" That is where the site comes into use, by comparing damping coefficients.

Your post speaks of a "site", but does not give a link.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top