How to prove ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## in curved space using the given equation?

user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
See below.
Relevant Equations
See below.
Question ##1##.

Consider the following identity

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\epsilon_{i}^{\phantom{i}lm}=h^{jl}h^{m}_{\phantom{m}k}-h^{jm}h^{l}_{\phantom{l}k}
\end{equation}

which we know holds in flat space. Does this identity still hold in curved space? and if so, how does one go about proving it?

Question ##2##.

Consider the following

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\left(V_{ai;j}-V_{aj;i}\right)=0.
\end{equation}

As ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## is not arbitrary, one cannot simply conclude that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}##. Yet, I want to show that one can get ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## from the above equation. Is there a way to do that rather than just saying that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## is a possible solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please define your notation. What are ##\epsilon## and ##h##?
 
##\epsilon_{ijk}## is the Levi-Civita tensor and ##h_{ij}## is the metric tensor in 3-space.
 
Are you referring to the object with componens ##\pm 1## an 0 (which is not a tensor but a tensor density - and if so what do you mean by raising/lowering its indices) or to the actual tensor with components ##\pm 1## and 0 in an orthonormal coordinate system?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top