How to prove ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## in curved space using the given equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an identity involving the Levi-Civita tensor and the metric tensor in the context of curved space. The original poster questions whether a specific identity holds in curved space and seeks to establish a relationship between certain derivatives of a vector field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the validity of an identity in curved space and seeks a method to derive a specific equality involving vector derivatives. Participants raise questions about the definitions and properties of the tensors involved, indicating a need for clarification on notation and assumptions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively questioning the definitions of the tensors and their properties. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the Levi-Civita tensor and the metric tensor, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's queries.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding the notation used by the original poster, particularly concerning the Levi-Civita tensor and the metric tensor, which may affect the interpretation of the problem. The discussion also highlights the distinction between tensors and tensor densities.

user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
See below.
Relevant Equations
See below.
Question ##1##.

Consider the following identity

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\epsilon_{i}^{\phantom{i}lm}=h^{jl}h^{m}_{\phantom{m}k}-h^{jm}h^{l}_{\phantom{l}k}
\end{equation}

which we know holds in flat space. Does this identity still hold in curved space? and if so, how does one go about proving it?

Question ##2##.

Consider the following

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\left(V_{ai;j}-V_{aj;i}\right)=0.
\end{equation}

As ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## is not arbitrary, one cannot simply conclude that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}##. Yet, I want to show that one can get ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## from the above equation. Is there a way to do that rather than just saying that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## is a possible solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please define your notation. What are ##\epsilon## and ##h##?
 
##\epsilon_{ijk}## is the Levi-Civita tensor and ##h_{ij}## is the metric tensor in 3-space.
 
Are you referring to the object with componens ##\pm 1## an 0 (which is not a tensor but a tensor density - and if so what do you mean by raising/lowering its indices) or to the actual tensor with components ##\pm 1## and 0 in an orthonormal coordinate system?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K