How to prove ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## in curved space using the given equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identity ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## in curved space using the equation involving the Levi-Civita tensor ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## and the metric tensor ##h_{ij}##. The identity, originally valid in flat space, is questioned for its applicability in curved space. Participants emphasize the need for a rigorous approach to demonstrate the equality rather than assuming it as a solution, highlighting the significance of defining the notation clearly, particularly the roles of ##\epsilon## and ##h##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus and differential geometry.
  • Familiarity with the Levi-Civita tensor and its properties.
  • Knowledge of metric tensors and their role in curved space.
  • Basic concepts of covariant derivatives and their notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita tensor in curved spaces.
  • Explore the implications of covariant derivatives on tensor equations.
  • Learn about the metric tensor and its applications in general relativity.
  • Investigate the proof techniques for identities involving tensors in differential geometry.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in general relativity or differential geometry who seek to deepen their understanding of tensor identities in curved spaces.

user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
See below.
Relevant Equations
See below.
Question ##1##.

Consider the following identity

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\epsilon_{i}^{\phantom{i}lm}=h^{jl}h^{m}_{\phantom{m}k}-h^{jm}h^{l}_{\phantom{l}k}
\end{equation}

which we know holds in flat space. Does this identity still hold in curved space? and if so, how does one go about proving it?

Question ##2##.

Consider the following

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\left(V_{ai;j}-V_{aj;i}\right)=0.
\end{equation}

As ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## is not arbitrary, one cannot simply conclude that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}##. Yet, I want to show that one can get ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## from the above equation. Is there a way to do that rather than just saying that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## is a possible solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please define your notation. What are ##\epsilon## and ##h##?
 
##\epsilon_{ijk}## is the Levi-Civita tensor and ##h_{ij}## is the metric tensor in 3-space.
 
Are you referring to the object with componens ##\pm 1## an 0 (which is not a tensor but a tensor density - and if so what do you mean by raising/lowering its indices) or to the actual tensor with components ##\pm 1## and 0 in an orthonormal coordinate system?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K