How to Solve a Static Forces Angle Problem with Variable Length

Madcat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I drew up a little diagram to illustrate the problem.

PhysicsLabQuestion.jpg


The goal of this lab report is to find the h value (in cm) for each of the possible masses at B. (one problem for 500g, one for 700g and one for 900g. The only thing that should change is the h value. The leftmost mass never changes)
θ and a are unknown. The pulley on the left is considered to be frictionless and the cords masses are negligible.

Point B is "tied" so the cord does not slide and thus BC is fixed at 60 cm. Length AB however is variable due to the pulley.

Homework Equations



Sin(θ) = opposite/hypotenuses
Cos(θ) = adjacent/hypotenuses
Tan(θ) = opposite/adjacent

The Attempt at a Solution



Here are the equations I've come up with thus far.

Cos(a) = ABx/4.9N
Sin(a) = ABy/4.9N
ABx/Cos(a) = ABy/ Sin(a)

cos(θ) = (105-d)/60 (d being the top side of the left-most triangle, separated at h)
tan(a) = h/d
h = sqrt( (60^2) - ((105-d)^2) )

I can also say that:
BCx = ABx (as this is a static question. B is at rest, thus all resulting forces acting on it are equal to 0)
BCy + ABy - W = 0
or alternatively
BCy + ABy = W
(where W is the current mass of the object at point B)

I "know" the solution lies in the angles, but for the life of me I just can't fit my equations together in order to draw a definite conclusion. I'd love a push in the right direction if anyone can contribute something to this. I keep trying to break down the forces but without an angle it is difficult and I can't find the proper substitution.

First time post here, I hope I did it right, thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Madcat said:
I "know" the solution lies in the angles, but for the life of me I just can't fit my equations together in order to draw a definite conclusion. I'd love a push in the right direction if anyone can contribute something to this. I keep trying to break down the forces but without an angle it is difficult and I can't find the proper substitution.

It seems that you're on the right track...

Take a step back before trying to solve for the angle. What are the forces acting on the two blocks? How do these forces relate to the angles?

-Kerry
 
Last edited:
It has been a week and I still seem to be unable to get the answer myself.
A colleague did the calculations and passed them to me, but they seem to essentially be my own calculations and don't give an h value (which we are searching for)
I plugged them into Maple 12 and it cannot solve it. I am quite certain I have too many unknowns and I cannot figure out how to elemenate them.

If someone could at least confirm I am not missing any formulas or maybe which angle to focus on? (I would figure I need to 'link' the formula's using the angles, but have yet to figure out how)

Thanks again.

Oh, and the formula's he gave me are...

-4.905*cos(a) - Tr cos(q)=0

-4.905 + 4.905*sin(a)+Tr*sin(q)=0

.6/(sin(a))= 1.05/(sin(180 - (a +q))
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF!

Hi Madcat! Welcome to PF! :smile:

You know T, and you know that tan(a) = h/(105 - 60cosθ).

You don't know the tension in the 60 string, and you don't want to know it, so … standard trick … take components perpendicular to that string.

What do you get? :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top