How to Solve an Integral Involving Modified Bessel Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phy07
  • Start date Start date
phy07
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


g2kqg.png

This is my homework. I couldn't solve the integral.



Homework Equations


Kv(z) being a modified Bessel function.
β=1/kT
k: Boltzmann Constant


The Attempt at a Solution


I made p=m c sinh θ transformation and obtained an integral form as follows

∫exp(-mc2coshθ/kT)(cosh2θ-1)coshθ dθ

but i couldn't forward more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should use the integral representation of the modified Bessel function K as given by

K_{\nu} (z) = \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} e^{-z\cosh t}\cosh \nu t {}{} ~ dt
 
Last edited:
thanks for your help.now i found a result likes the modified Bessel function.
\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} e^{-a\cosh θ}\cosh \3 θ {}{} ~ dθ -\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} e^{-a\cosh θ}\cosh \ θ {}{} ~ dθ
a:constant
but i don't know how to resolve the bessel function.can you show a way?
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by 'resolve the Bessel function' ?
 
ok sorry.i must write the equation in terms of bessel function.thanks for all your helps... :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top