How to Solve and Apply Boundary Conditions for the Sturm-Liouville Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ftarak
  • Start date Start date
ftarak
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the question is how to write the following equation to S-L form and solve the equation

Homework Equations



<br /> x^{2}y&#039;&#039; + xy&#039; + \lambda^{2}y = 0 <br />

<br /> y(1/10) = y(2) = 0<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to write above equation in form

<br /> d[x^{2}y&#039;]/dx + 2\lambda^{2}y = 0 <br /> <br />
but it doesn't work, because it is not equal the above equation. Does anybody know how to re-write above equation in S-L form?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Divide the original equation through by x and note that xy'' + y' = (xy')'.
 
If you have a differential equation of the form

p0(x) y'' + p1(x) y' + p2(x) y = 0

multiply it by

\frac{1}{p_0(x)}\exp\left[\int^x \frac{p_1(x&#039;)}{p_0(x&#039;)}\,dx&#039;\right]

Then you'll be able to write the first two terms in the form you want.
 
snipez90 said:
Divide the original equation through by x and note that xy'' + y' = (xy')'.

thank you so much. it was so helpful o:)
 
vela said:
If you have a differential equation of the form

p0(x) y'' + p1(x) y' + p2(x) y = 0

multiply it by

\frac{1}{p_0(x)}\exp\left[\int^x \frac{p_1(x&#039;)}{p_0(x&#039;)}\,dx&#039;\right]

Then you'll be able to write the first two terms in the form you want.

thanks buddy
 
hi guys,
I have another question, when I suppose that one of the solution for this problem is

<br /> y(x) = x^{m}<br />
actually, it doesn't work because it directs me to trivial solution and gives me the zero coefficients after applying the boundary conditions, do you have any idea about the supposition of yj(x) for applying the boundary condition and then calculating the coefficients.

many thanks if you give me a hint
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top