How to solve current circuit problems without enough information?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nicolas01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Current
AI Thread Summary
Applying Kirchhoff's rules is suggested to solve circuit problems involving unknown currents and resistances, but insufficient information complicates the process. The direction of the ammeter current remains ambiguous without additional data, leading to multiple possible solutions. Participants emphasize that the lack of specific details makes it challenging to arrive at a definitive answer. The discussion highlights the importance of having complete information for accurate circuit analysis. Ultimately, the inability to determine certain variables limits the problem-solving approach.
Nicolas01
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
a
Relevant Equations
a
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/267955 I think i should apply kirchkoff rules so I can find i1,i2,i3 R1,R' but I don't have enough information and I don't know how to have those informations .What is your ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In which direction is the ammeter current?
If that is not given, there are multiple answers to this problem.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Nicolas01
cnh1995 said:
In which direction is the ammeter current?
If that is not given, there are multiple answers to this problem.
It's arbitrary I guess, because i don't have the information
 
Nicolas01 said:
Homework Statement:: a
Relevant Equations:: a

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/267955 I think i should apply kirchkoff rules so I can find i1,i2,i3 R1,R' but I don't have enough information and I don't know how to have those informations .What is your ideas?
Do NOT edit/delete your post after you have received replies. That is tantamount to cheating, and is not allowed on the PF. Check your PMs. Thread is locked.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top