Human Eye Optics: Near-Sightedness, Tree Image Distance & Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter runfast220
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye Human Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to optics for a nearsighted person using contact lenses. The far point is established at 6.0 m, and the tree is located 18.0 m away with a height of 2.0 m. The participants clarify that the contacts act as a diverging lens, which means the image distance must be treated as negative. The calculations initially presented are corrected to reflect that the image formed by the contacts is virtual and located at -9.0 m, leading to a height of -1.0 m for the image. The conversation emphasizes understanding the lens type and proper application of optical equations.
runfast220
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The far point of a nearsighted person is 6.0 m from her eyes, and she wears contacts that enable her to see distant objects clearly. A tree is 18.0 m away and 2.0 m high. (a) when she looks through the contacts at the tree, what is its image distance? (b) How high is the image formed by the contacts?

Homework Equations



m= hi/ho=-di/do
1/do + 1/di = 1/f

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to start the problem. Can someone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi runfast220! :wink:
runfast220 said:
The far point of a nearsighted person is 6.0 m from her eyes, and she wears contacts that enable her to see distant objects clearly. A tree is 18.0 m away and 2.0 m high. (a) when she looks through the contacts at the tree, what is its image distance? (b) How high is the image formed by the contacts?

The contact is a lens that makes an object at ∞ have an image at 6.0 m.

So calculate its f, and then apply that to an object at 18.0 m. :smile:
 
ok so...

1/f = 1/infin + 1/6
so f=6.0

1/di = 1/6 - 1/18 = .11
di = 9.0 m

hi/ho = - di/do
hi/2 = -9/18

hi = -1.0 m

does that look right?
 
Hi runfast220! :smile:
runfast220 said:
… does that look right?

Nooo :redface: … you've got the tree focussing at 9.0 m, which is too far away for the nearsighted person to see it!

Hint: is the contact a converging or a diverging lens? :wink:
 
Its a converging lens so does that make the di a virtual image thus making it -9.0m?
 
No, it's a diverging lens …

a converging lens wold make parallel lines (from ∞) come closer, but these contacts make them diverge, so that they appear to come from 6.0 m in front of the person.

And (from the PF Library on lens …)
f is positive for converging (eg. biconvex and plano-convex) lenses, and negative for diverging (eg. biconcave and plano-concave) lenses.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top