Hydrocarbon Structural Diagrams

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the structural representation of trimethylbutane and the placement of its methyl branches. The key point is that when the location of the branches is unspecified, the correct interpretation is that the only valid structure is 2,2,3-trimethylbutane. This is because placing branches on the first or last carbon would not yield a butane structure. The clarification addresses the confusion regarding the significance of branch positioning, confirming that the structure must adhere to specific rules of nomenclature in organic chemistry.
JDK
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was quite curious about this one here...

If I were asked to draw a structural diagram, for example, of trimethylbutane, where would I put the three branches of methyl. When they don't specify the location of the branches what does one do? I'd normally be expecting something like 2,3,3-trimethylbutane, etc. The reason I'm asking is because there are many combinations one could produce to put out something in this format x,x,x-trimethylbutane. Therefore I became unsure if the question was correct or if I was mistaken... or overly paranoid...

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
2,2,3 (or 2,3,3)-trimethyl butane seems to be the only option, because if either was at the first or last position, it would not be a butane; therefore, regardless of which end you start at, you will end up with 2,2,3- trimethyl butane.

Hope that helps.
 
Yes that does. Thank-you. I didn't know it was significant if the branches were on the first/last carbon atoms. That clears up my confusion. :smile:
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top