Hydrogen Atom in Uniform Electric Field

Frank0
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just did exercise 1.22 in Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund. This is a practice problem about linear variational method.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: The Schrodinger equation(in atomic units) for a hydrogen atom in a uniform electric field F in the z direction is
(-1/2∇2-1/r+Frcosθ)|ψ>=(H0+Frcosθ)|ψ>=ε(F)|ψ>
Use the trial function |ψ>=c1|1s>+c2|2pz>
where |1s> and |2pz> are normalized eigenfunctions of H0, i.e.,
|1s>=exp(-r)/sqrt(pi)
|2pz>=r*exp(-r/2)*cosθ/sqrt(32pi)
to find an upper bound to ε(F). In constructing the matrix representation of H, you can avoid a lot of work by noting that
(H0)|1s>=-1/2|1s>
(H0)|2pz>=-1/8|2pz>
Using sqrt(1+x)=1+x/2, expand your answer in a Taylor series in F, i.e.,
E(F)=E(0)-αF2/2+...
Show that the coefficient α, which is approximate dipole polarizability of the system, is equal to 2.96. The exact result is 4.5.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've done the integral and got
<1s|H|1s>=-1/2
<1s|H|2pz>=<2pz|H|1s>=F*128sqrt(2)/243
<2pz|H|2pz>=-1/8
so matrix representation of H is
(-1/2 F*128sqrt(2)/243)
(F*128sqrt(2)/243 -1/8)
Solve the eigenvalue problem for H we get
E(F)=-5/16-3/16*(1+8388608/534681 F2)1/2 (lower eigenvalue)
and α=524288/178227

My question is
(a)Is there any intuitive explanation for <1s|H|1s>=<1s|H0|1s> and same for 2pz?
(b)Is there any intuitive explanation about why H=H0+Frcosθ is Hermitian?
(c)If anyone is willing to repeat the calculation could you please check the result for me? The book says α=2.96 but I get α=524288/178227=2.94...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Frank0 said:
(a)Is there any intuitive explanation for <1s|H|1s>=<1s|H0|1s> and same for 2pz?
Symmetry. If you put the (undisturbed, symmetric) ground state in a uniform electric field, the increased potential at one side is canceled by the lowered potential at the other side.

(b)Is there any intuitive explanation about why H=H0+Frcosθ is Hermitian?
It is just another potential shape plus the usual kinetic term.

(c)If anyone is willing to repeat the calculation could you please check the result for me? The book says α=2.96 but I get α=524288/178227=2.94...
Does the book give an analytic expression? Maybe it is just a rounding error.
 
mfb said:
Symmetry. If you put the (undisturbed, symmetric) ground state in a uniform electric field, the increased potential at one side is canceled by the lowered potential at the other side.


It is just another potential shape plus the usual kinetic term.


Does the book give an analytic expression? Maybe it is just a rounding error.

Thanks and the book does not give analytic expression, I put exactly what the book says between the dash line.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top