How Is a Hyperbola Formed from Conic Sections?

  • Thread starter Thread starter barryj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbola
AI Thread Summary
Conic sections are created by slicing a double cone with a plane, resulting in different shapes based on the angle of the cut. A hyperbola is formed when the cutting plane intersects both cones but is not parallel to the axis. The resulting shape remains symmetrical between the top and bottom cones, similar to how an ellipse is formed from a non-perpendicular cut. Visualizing this can be challenging, but constructing physical models of the cones can aid understanding. Ultimately, the geometry confirms that such cuts still produce a hyperbola.
barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
Conic sections are formed when a plane cuts a double cone, i.e. two cones placed tip to tip along the same axis. A circle is when the plane is perpendicular to the axis, an ellipes when the plane is slightly canted, a parabola when the plane is EXACTLY parallel to the edge of the cones so that the plane cuts only one of the cones. Now the question.

Every diagram I have seen shows the hyperbola being formed when the cutting plane is parallel to the axis of the cones. The plane therefore cuts both the top and bottom cone. What do you get if the cutting plane cuts through both cones but is not exactly parallel to the axis of the cones. Is this still a hyperbola or some other function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's still a hyperbola.
 
I find this hard to visualize. So the cut on the top cone would be symmetrical to the cut on the bottom cone as a hyperbola?
 
barryj said:
I find this hard to visualize. So the cut on the top cone would be symmetrical to the cut on the bottom cone as a hyperbola?

Yes. Just as when you get an ellipse (tha is not a circle) if the cut is not perpendicular to the axis.

I guess the best way to convince you is to either read a (geometrical) proof of it, or to construct two cones yourself and make the cut.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top