I have got a lab on 'Braking distance of a wooden block'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bharat_prakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the braking distance of a wooden block and calculating the associated uncertainty in measurements. The participant has derived an equation relating the mass of the block to its braking distance but seeks clarification on how to compute uncertainty and represent it graphically. To find uncertainty, the method involves calculating the deviation of individual measurements from the mean, with suggestions to use standard deviation for a more accurate measure of spread. Additionally, guidance is provided on how to input varying error values for each data point in Excel for accurate graph representation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise measurement and representation in experimental data analysis.
Bharat_prakash
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have got a lab on 'braking distance of a wooden block' and I have to find an equation which fits our experiment and find the uncertainty. I have an equation but I can't find the uncertainty.

This is how, I went about my lab...

To find the relationship between the mass of the wooden block and the braking distance, we incrementally increase the mass of the wooden block. With the help of rubber bands, we project the wooden block in a linear motion on a plane surface. Then, we record the braking distance.

Homework Equations


I have come up with these equations
lg⁡(d)=-0.8814 lg⁡(m)+3.9708

lg⁡(d)=-0.8814 lg⁡(m)+lg⁡(〖10〗^3.9708)

=lg⁡(m^(-0.8814) )+lg⁡(〖10〗^3.9708)

=lg⁡(m^(-0.8814) ) ×⁡(〖10〗^3.9708)

d=9350m^(-0.88)

=9350m^((-88)⁄100)

d^100=〖9350〗^100 m^(-0.88)

How do I find the uncertainity and how do I go about it? It would really helpful if you guys reply quickly, the lab is due tomorrow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you took multiple measurements to create that equation. The variability in those measurements should indicate the uncertainty.
 
Yes, I did take multiple measurements to create that equation. But what I don't get is, what will be my next step to find the uncertainty. I asked my teacher and he said, that the (max deviation - the average value) is my uncertainty but I really don't get what he means by that.

I also need to draw error bars on my graph and every point has a different uncertainty value but excel doesn't allow me to change the uncertainty value from point to point.

Thanks
 
Hey, I found out what to do with uncertainty although now I am on the graph part and I have to state what the gradient means.

I have plotted the graph of

On Y axis: Distance Travled by the wooden block
On X axis: Weight of the wooden block

I don't know what the gradient will mean or even if it means something? Thanks
 
If you've taken several measurements for each point, you can calculate the mean value (sometimes called just the average). For each of your measurements, then, you can calculate how far away from the mean value it is. Your teacher is suggesting that you use the largest value of this (ignoring minus signs) as a measure of spread.

It's not a good measure of spread, though. Imagine that you make a thousand measurements, and 999 of them are between 11 and 12, but you really mess up one measurement and get 18. Is 6-point-something really a fair measure of the spread? A better measure is the standard error on the mean - the standard deviation (look it up if you need to) of your measurements divided by the square root of the number of measurements.

You can do different errors for each point in Excel. One of the options let's you enter a cell range. Use that and enter the error bar values in the spreadsheet. For example, x-value in column A, y-value in column B, upper error limit in column C and lower error limit in column D.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top