If a 1000kg Mass resting on a friction free airbed....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizzics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Mass
AI Thread Summary
A discussion revolves around the potential recovery of electrical braking energy from a 1000kg mass on a friction-free airbed accelerated to 1 meter per second. Participants highlight that using a magnet in a linear motor could yield efficiencies between 95% and 98.5%, with superconductors potentially increasing this further. Questions arise about the feasibility of using a non-magnetic mass and its interaction with magnetic components, as well as considerations of air resistance and track design. Suggestions include using springs for energy efficiency and optimizing track elevation for better performance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanics and energy recovery methods in such systems.
Fizzics
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Question: If a 1000kg Mass resting on a friction free airbed is accelerated from zero to 1 Metre per second by a drive motor, then the motor is disconnected, how much electrical braking energy could be recovered from the moving mass in percentage terms using modern technology. Thank you in advance for your considered replies which should be very helpful to me.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the mass is a magnet traveling through the coil of a linear motor, then the efficiency should be comparable to a power transformer - in the commercial sector, about 95 to 98.5%.
It depends on how "off-the-shelf" you require. If you want to use super-conductors, you could get higher efficiencies.
 
.Scott said:
If the mass is a magnet traveling through the coil of a linear motor, then the efficiency should be comparable to a power transformer - in the commercial sector, about 95 to 98.5%.
It depends on how "off-the-shelf" you require. If you want to use super-conductors, you could get higher efficiencies.
Hi Scott,
I'm talking about a non magnetic mass accelerating then deaccelerating in a linear fashion oscillating backwards and forwards, I was also wondering whether it is actually possible to have a 1000kg magnet working in the way you have suggested?
 
Am I allowed to attach something to it? If I do nothing, how long will it stay on the track? Is it also subject to air resistance?
If it's non-magnetic, I will need to "touch" it in some other way. For example,attaching it to a magnet or placing it onto a trolley.
What are your rules?

Can I arrange an elastic collision between the 1Mg mass and another 1Mg mass that is magnetic?
 
Hi Scott
Thanks for your feedback it has been very helpful and food for thought, I hope to come back with a reply to your last question in the next couple of days.
 
Fizzics said:
I'm talking about a non magnetic mass accelerating then deaccelerating in a linear fashion oscillating backwards and forwards,
Why accelerate and decelerate if you do not need to? A big spring at each end of the track, or one mounted on the cart would be more economical.
If it was a railway I would advocate raising the ends of the track. If you needed a longer time at the ends a flat "landing" could be provided.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top