Impedance of circuit with capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The impedance of a series circuit with a capacitor (100 ohms), inductor (300 ohms), and resistor (400 ohms) can be calculated using vector addition of voltages. The voltage across the capacitor leads the current by 90 degrees, while the voltage across the inductor lags by 90 degrees, and the voltage across the resistor corresponds directly to the current. The total voltage, V_s, is the vector sum of these voltages, expressed as V_s = √((V_c - V_L)² + V_r²). This leads to the formula for impedance, Z = √((X_c - X_L)² + r²), resulting in an impedance of √(200kΩ). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding phase relationships in AC circuits for accurate impedance calculations.
athenaroa
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
You are given a capacitor( impedance 100 ohms), an inductor (impedance 300 ohms) and a resistor (400 ohms), all connected in series. Determine the impedance( in ohms) of this circuit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This sounds as if you are trying to get someone to do your homework. Can you give us a little more detail? Before we give you an answer, can you at least give us several possible outcomes of the problem?
 
(Assuming your EMF is of AC:)

{V_r}_{max} = {I_s}_{max}r
{V_L}_{max} = {I_s}_{max}X_L
{V_c}_{max} = {I_s}_{max}X_c

I'm not going to explain the whole theory here, but you should know that in this kind of circuit the V_c precedes the current by 90 degrees, V_L is lagging by 90 degrees, and V_r corresponds to the current exactly. (I'm probably using the wrong terms and not explaining this very well ).

Therefore you can draw a diagram of {V_c}_{max}, {V_L}_{max}, and {V_r}_{max}, whereby {V_c}_{max} is 90 degrees ahead of {V_r}_{max} and {V_L}_{max} is 90 degrees behind it.

But you should also know that all the time:

V_r + V_L + V_c = V_s

So to find V_s at any moment you need to sum up all three V's, while treating them as vectors. On the axis that connects {V_c}_{max} and {V_L}_{max} the sum would be {V_c}_{max} - {V_L}_{max}, and on the other axis the sum would simply be {V_r}_{max}. Using pythagoras you can show that:

V_s = \sqrt{({V_c}_{max} - {V_L}_{max})^2 + {V_r}_{max}^2}

Which becomes:

{I_s}_{max}Z = \sqrt{({I_s}_{max}X_c - {I_s}_{max}X_L)^2 + ({I_s}_{max}r)^2}

And if you divide by {I_s}_{max}:

Z = \sqrt{(X_c - X_L)^2 + r^2}

So Z, or the impedance of this circuit, is \sqrt{200k\Omega}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top